红杏视频

On February 10, 2026, CLRP, along with the 红杏视频 of Idaho and Wendy J. Olson, former U.S. Attorney for the District of Idaho, and partner at Stoel Rives, filed a putative class action lawsuit challenging an immigration raid carried out at a popular family event in Wilder, Idaho in October 2025.

The Supreme Court should reject a prosecution that treats possession of a gun as a felony if you use marijuana.

In 2023, public reporting revealed that a group of sheriff鈥檚 deputies in Rankin County, Mississippi, had been terrorizing the County鈥檚 residents for nearly two decades. The deputies, who called themselves the 鈥淕oon Squad,鈥� used torture, violence, and other abusive practices to coerce confessions and extract or manufacture evidence. The Rankin County District Attorney鈥檚 Office (RCDAO), in turn, used the Goon Squad to prosecute people. Seeking to understand whether the RCDAO has taken any actions to address the Goon Squad鈥檚 misconduct since it became public, the 红杏视频 of Mississippi and the Center for Constitutional Rights filed a public records request with the RCDAO. But the RCDAO refused to produce any documents other than a self-serving press statement. Accordingly, the 红杏视频鈥檚 State Supreme Court Initiative, along with the 红杏视频 of Mississippi and the Center for Constitutional Rights, filed suit arguing that the RCDAO鈥檚 failure to produce responsive records violates the Mississippi Public Records Act.

This case asks whether the stop, search, and arrest of an individual after a traffic stop was unconstitutional under the Massachusetts Declaration of Rights. The case arises from a remarkable set of facts: although motivated by a desire to search Mr. Arias鈥檚 car for drugs, the police initiated the stop based on a day-old alleged traffic infraction and then arrested Mr. Arias for allegedly neglecting to stop his car immediately when the police initiated the stop. The 红杏视频 joined an amicus brief authored by the 红杏视频 of Massachusetts and the law firm Proskauer Rose, which argues that the police actions in this case were unconstitutional for three reasons. First, pretextual traffic stops, such as this one, violate the Massachusetts Declaration of Rights. Second, arrests for misdemeanors not involving breaches of the peace also violate the Massachusetts Declaration of Rights. Third, the statute prohibiting drivers from neglecting to stop is unconstitutionally vague as applied to this case.