红杏视频

WASHINGTON 鈥� The 红杏视频 and the American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO) today released a new report, Citizenship and the Affordability Agenda: A Path to Better Jobs, Higher Wages, and Prosperity for All, detailing how the mass deportation agenda is exacerbating the affordability crisis by disrupting critical industries, eliminating jobs, weakening workplace protections, and driving up costs for working families. The findings come as communities continue to suffer the impact of mass de-legalization, record levels of immigration arrests and rebound from the economic toll of militarized enforcement operations like Minnesota鈥檚 鈥淥peration Metro Surge." The report finds that a broad path to citizenship would stabilize jobs and prices across the construction, hospitality, and care industries that families depend on while raising wages for all American workers. It also examines how Congress has committed at least $240 billion to immigration enforcement, while cutting funding for programs that help families afford food and health care, including SNAP, Medicaid, and Affordable Care Act subsidies 鈥� and in some cases allowing them to expire. 鈥淒eportations make workers poorer and more vulnerable to exploitation by employers,鈥� said Naureen Shah, director of government affairs, equality division at the 红杏视频. 鈥淲hen ICE continuously raids a community, everyone pays for it 鈥� in lost jobs higher prices and damaged businesses. The only immigration agenda that actually improves affordability is one that creates a broad path to citizenship.鈥� 鈥淲orking people are paying the price for an immigration system that is destabilizing entire industries and communities and making it easier to exploit workers,鈥� said AFL-CIO President Liz Shuler. 鈥淎s this report demonstrates, a broad pathway to citizenship for all would raise wages, create more and better jobs, and strengthen our economy in ways that help all of us. It鈥檚 past time to give millions of working people and their families the stability they deserve, and we call on Congress to make citizenship a top priority. Working people know that it鈥檚 not an immigrant that stands between them and a good job鈥攊t鈥檚 the billionaires鈥攁nd it鈥檚 time our laws reflect that. Among the report鈥檚 key findings: Immigration enforcement enables workplace exploitation. The federal government now spends 91 times more on immigration enforcement than on labor-standards enforcement, which leaves workplaces more dangerous and enables employers to violate wage, safety, and overtime laws while crushing worker organizing. More than a quarter of workers in low-wage industries report minimum-wage violations. While these abuses are highest among immigrant workers, they are widespread enough to suppress pay and standards for all workers in those industries, regardless of immigration status. Immigration raids stunt business activity and revenue creation. Immigration raids and enforcement surges have terrified people from going to work, shopping, dining out, and participating in their communities. The report cites an estimated 8.1 billion fewer visits to businesses and between $3 billion and $14 billion in lost annual spending. For example, Minnesota businesses lost $10鈥�$20 million a week during and after 鈥淥peration Metro Surge.鈥� Mass deportation eliminates jobs held by U.S. citizens. The Economic Policy Institute projects continued pursuit of the administration鈥檚 deportation agenda could eliminate nearly 6 million jobs, almost half of which are currently held by U.S. citizens. Stripping workers鈥� legal immigration status is worsening the affordability crisis. The Trump administration鈥檚 mass 鈥渄e-documentation鈥� campaign has stopped work authorization from nearly 2 million people, disrupting key industries like construction and hospitality. A broad path to citizenship would create jobs and raise wages. Creating a path to citizenship would create hundreds of thousands of new jobs and substantially raise wages for every American worker= by removing immigration status as a tool employers use to suppress pay and silence workers. This report, published in partnership with the AFL-CIO, is the third in the 红杏视频鈥檚 affirmative vision series, in which policy and legal experts explore how the Trump administration鈥檚 immigration agenda has harmed communities nationwide, undermined our democracy, and wreaked havoc on key industries and weakened the American workforce. The series will also outline steps that members of Congress, as well as state and local policymakers, can take to reform the U.S. immigration system and inoculate against future attacks on our rights and safety. You can read the full report here: /publications/citizenship-and-the-affordability-agenda-a-path-to-better-jobs-higher-wages-and-prosperity-for-all

Through shadowy deportation agreements, the Trump administration is sending detained individuals to countries where they have no ties 鈥� and may face persecution.

WASHINGTON 鈥� Today, both parties in Genalo v. G.M. filed a joint stipulation asking the U.S. Supreme Court to dismiss the case as moot following a pardon granted by New York Governor Hochul that eliminated the basis for Mr. G.M.鈥檚 deportation and detention. At the request of both sides, the Supreme Court dismissed the case, thereby cancelling upcoming arguments. The Second Circuit ruling requiring due process protections for prolonged detention will remain in place. Mr. G.M. is a lawful permanent resident who was held in ICE detention for 21 months without a bond hearing. His now-moot case challenged his prolonged immigration detention without meaningful due process. The 红杏视频, New York Civil Liberties Union, MacArthur Justice Center, and Hecker Fink LLP are co-counsel in this case. 鈥淭his is a great outcome for our client who no longer faces the threat of deportation and future immigration detention,鈥� said Cecillia Wang, national legal director of the 红杏视频. 鈥淭he Second Circuit reached the correct decision in recognizing that prolonged immigration detention cannot continue without due process, and that decision will remain in place. We will continue to defend our Constitution鈥檚 limits on immigration detention and will keep up the fight against Trump administration鈥檚 extreme, unprecedented, and lawless positions.鈥� "We are heartened that our client will not be separated from his family," said Amy Belsher, supervising attorney at the New York Civil Liberties Union. "The Second Circuit made abundantly clear that immigrants are entitled to due process, and we're gratified that their ruling will protect all those in the Second Circuit from prolonged detention." "Mr. G.M. spent 21 months locked away by ICE, separated from his family and community, without any consideration of whether he actually posed a danger or a flight risk. The Second Circuit saw that for what it was: a violation of due process," said Amit Jain, Counsel for the Supreme Court and Appellate Program at the MacArthur Justice Center. "This is a victory for Mr. G.M., and we will continue to fight alongside anyone, regardless of immigration status, who experiences such grave violations of due process." The administration鈥檚 position in Genalo v. G.M. drew cross-ideological opposition with 11 amicus briefs filed in total, including from former Republican senior government officials, members of Congress, and a former federal judge. In an amicus brief supporting G.M., they wrote that in their prior government roles they had 鈥渘ever asserted, nor ever heard the Government argue to this Court,鈥� that a noncitizen detained under this law has no fundamental liberty interest. Although Genalo v. G.M will no longer proceed before the Supreme Court, the Trump administration鈥檚 efforts to expand mandatory detention and deny bond hearings to people who are immigrants, including longtime residents with deep ties to their families and communities, continues. Similar cases could make their way to the Supreme Court and will be met with forceful defense of due process. The joint stipulation is available here.

RICHMOND, Va.鈥� Another federal appeals court has rejected the Trump administration鈥檚 new policy subjecting millions of immigrants to mandatory detention without access to bond hearings. The Fourth Circuit is now the ninth federal appeals courts to find the policy unlawful, along with hundreds of district courts. The ruling arose from habeas corpus petitions filed on behalf of Oscar Lopez Garcia and Juan Jose Rivera by their respective immigration counsel, Benach Pitney Reilly LLP and Ceartas Solutions. The 红杏视频, the 红杏视频 of Virginia, and Murray Osorio PLLC joined the legal team representing petitioners in the government鈥檚 consolidated appeal. The case is Lopez Garcia v. Guadian. Last year, the Trump administration adopted a new radical reinterpretation of longstanding immigration laws and declared that anyone who entered the country without inspection must be detained without access to bond. For decades prior, people in removal proceedings who were detained by the government have generally had the right to seek release by an immigration judge. Among those who have been affected by the administration鈥檚 radical reinterpretation are people eligible for legal status, even those with long-pending immigration applications who have been waiting years due to administrative backlogs. The following is reaction to today鈥檚 ruling: 鈥淭he courts have resoundingly rejected the administration鈥檚 cruel policy and its blatant disrespect for the rule of law,鈥� said My Khanh Ngo, senior staff attorney with the 红杏视频鈥檚 Immigrants鈥� Rights Project. 鈥淲e are thrilled for our clients and their families.鈥� 鈥淭he government cannot rewrite immigration law to serve this administration's anti-immigrant agenda by detaining people en masse, and today鈥檚 ruling again makes that crystal clear,鈥� said Sophia Gregg, senior immigrants鈥� rights attorney with the 红杏视频 of Virginia. 鈥淭he Fourth Circuit鈥檚 decision is an important victory for both Virginians and for our civil rights and civil liberties nationwide.鈥� 鈥淭he Court has it right: 鈥楳ass detention of marginalized individuals without due process harkens back to some of the darkest moments in our country鈥檚 history... Those shameful and abhorrent past detentions were limited in scope in comparison to鈥� what the Government asked for in this case. We are thrilled that the Court declined to expand mandatory detention to millions of people,鈥� said Sarah Pitney, partner at Benach Pitney Reilly LLP and counsel for Mr. Lopez Garcia. 鈥淚 have seen over and over again the devastating impact that the detention of a mother or father has on their children, many of whom are U.S. citizens,鈥� said Sarnata Reynolds, founding attorney at Ceartas Solutions. 鈥淭oday鈥檚 decision restores a basic safeguard: the government cannot imprison members of our communities throughout their immigration cases without giving them a meaningful chance to seek release.鈥� The ruling is here.