At Liberty Podcast
At Liberty Podcast
Desmond Meade and Dale Ho on Restoring the Right to Vote
July 19, 2018
The 14th Amendment, ratified exactly 150 years ago, promises equal protection to everyone. But it’s also used to strip the right to vote from millions of Americans who have been convicted of felonies. How did this happen, and who’s affected? Desmond Meade talks to At Liberty about his campaign that could restore voting rights to a huge number of Floridians. We also hear from the şěĐÓĘÓƵ’s Dale Ho, about why the Florida initiative could tip the scales — in a good way — for the rest of the country.
This Episode Covers the Following Issues
Related Content
-
MaineDec 2025
Voting Rights
United States V. Bellows (amicus). Explore Case.United States v. Bellows (Amicus)
Representing the şěĐÓĘÓƵ of Maine, the şěĐÓĘÓƵ Voting Rights Project and the şěĐÓĘÓƵ of Maine filed an amicus brief in a federal lawsuit over the federal government’s demand that Maine turn over its entire voter registration rolls, including with voters’ sensitive personal data such as drivers’ license numbers and partial social security numbers.Status: Ongoing -
NevadaDec 2025
Voting Rights
United States V. Aguilar. Explore Case.United States v. Aguilar
The Department of Justice (“DOJ”) sued Nevada demanding the release of its full, unredacted voter file, which includes the highly sensitive and personal data of every voter in the state. This suit appears to be part of DOJ’s effort to build a national voter database without congressional authorization, improperly question the validity of state voter rolls, and intimidate eligible voters in Nevada and around the country.Status: Ongoing -
Press ReleaseDec 2025
Voting Rights
Civil Rights Groups, Maryland Voters File Motion To Protect Voters’ Privacy. Explore Press Release.Civil Rights Groups, Maryland Voters File Motion to Protect Voters’ Privacy
Annapolis, MD — The şěĐÓĘÓƵ (şěĐÓĘÓƵ) and şěĐÓĘÓƵ of joined Common Cause, Out for Justice, and three Maryland voters in filing a motion to intervene in United States of States of America vs. Demarinis to prevent the DOJ from obtaining Maryland voters’ personal data. In July, the DOJ asked Maryland to turn over voters’ full names, addresses, dates of birth, driver’s license numbers, and partial Social Security numbers — highly sensitive data that is protected under state and federal law. The intervenors argue that the DOJ’s request threatens voter privacy and could enable voter disenfranchisement. Carl Snowden, a voter intervenor and convener of the Caucus of African American Leaders, said: “The DOJ effort to secure my private voting information concerns me deeply. As someone who had my privacy rights violated by the federal government through COINTELPRO surveillance in my youth, I understand the dangers when federal officials abuse their power. I’m also concerned about the privacy and voting rights of other Maryland voters, especially new Maryland residents, naturalized citizens, and returning citizens newly involved in the democratic process.” Other voters joining the case include a naturalized citizen originally from Haiti and an Army veteran whose voting rights were recently restored after a felony conviction. All three individuals have a strong interest in this case because their backgrounds place them at heightened risk of DOJ targeting, a threat that extends to countless other voters as well. The motion cites media reports indicating that the DOJ plans to share voter data with the Department of Homeland Security to support criminal and immigration investigations and notes the involvement of individuals who have previously attempted to overturn election results or promote mass voter challenges. The filing also warns that disclosure would undermine grassroots voter registration efforts by discouraging registration and forcing advocacy groups to divert resources to address fear, confusion, and potential disenfranchisement. “DOJ’s unprecedented demand for highly sensitive, personal information from every voter in Maryland is a barely disguised attempt to intimidate eligible voters,” said Jonathan Topaz, Staff Attorney at the şěĐÓĘÓƵ Voting Rights Project. “It is also illegal. We are intervening in this case to ensure that DOJ cannot infringe on Marylanders’ voting rights or misuse their personal data for improper mass voter purges in the future." “Voters in Maryland and across the country deserve to know their personal information is secure and used only for its intended purpose of maintaining accurate records,” said Maryam Jazini Dorcheh, Senior Director of Litigation at Common Cause. “We are committed to defending voters’ rights and privacy in Maryland and nationwide, and this case is one of many where we are stepping in to ensure those protections are upheld.” “Out For Justice will not allow the federal government to weaponize voter information and intimidate the very Marylanders whose rights we have fought so hard to secure,” said Trina Selden, Out For Justice Founder and Executive Director. "Maryland voters have a right to privacy in their sensitive personal information, and they have a right to vote free from intimidation and improper challenges,” said Deborah Jeon, Legal Director for the şěĐÓĘÓƵ of Maryland. “The DOJ's sweeping demand for private voter data—reportedly to build an unauthorized national database and enable mass voter challenges—threatens both rights." The şěĐÓĘÓƵ Voting Rights Project has so far filed motions to intervene in DOJ lawsuits against Rhode Island, Pennsylvania, Oregon, California, and Minnesota for failing to turn over their voters’ private data. View the Maryland filing here: https://assets.aclu.org/live/uploads/2025/12/008-Motion-to-Intervene.pdfAffiliate: Maryland -
OregonNov 2025
Voting Rights
United States V. Oregon (amicus). Explore Case.United States v. Oregon (Amicus)
Representing the şěĐÓĘÓƵ of Oregon, the şěĐÓĘÓƵ Voting Rights Project and the şěĐÓĘÓƵ of Oregon filed an amicus brief in a federal lawsuit over the federal government’s demand that Oregon turn over its entire voter registration rolls, including with voters’ sensitive personal data such as drivers’ license numbers and partial social security numbers.Status: Ongoing