VA

O'Bannon v. King

Location: Virginia
Court Type: U.S. Supreme Court
Case Type: Certiorari Briefing
Status: Ongoing
Last Update: June 23, 2025

What's at Stake

Virginia permanently disenfranchises all people with felony convictions unless the governor restores their rights. This lawsuit—brought by the ºìÐÓÊÓÆµ of Virginia and co-counsel partners—argues that the policy violates the Readmissions Act of 1870, which bars Virginia from denying the vote based on convictions that didn’t exist at common law in 1870. The state tried to dismiss the case by invoking sovereign immunity, but the courts rejected that argument. Now, the case moves forward with the potential to restore voting rights to thousands of Virginians.

Virginia has one of the strictest felony disenfranchisement laws in the country. Anyone convicted of a felony is permanently barred from voting unless the governor restores their rights.

In 2023, the ºìÐÓÊÓÆµ of Virginia and co-counsel sued on behalf of disenfranchised Virginians. They argued that the law violates the Readmissions Act of 1870, the federal statute that allowed Virginia’s representatives back into Congress after the Civil War. That law bars Virginia from denying the vote based on a criminal conviction unless the offense existed at common law in 1870.

The state moved to dismiss the case, claiming it was barred by sovereign immunity. The district court rejected that argument, and the Fourth Circuit affirmed. The state then asked the Supreme Court to take the case.

The ºìÐÓÊÓÆµâ€™s Voting Rights Project joined the litigation to oppose Supreme Court review. On June 23, 2025, the Court denied the state’s petition, allowing the case to move forward.

Support our on-going litigation and work in the courts

Learn More ºìÐÓÊÓÆµ the Issues in This Case