Trump Administration Appeals to Supreme Court in Muslim Ban Case
WASHINGTON — The Department of Justice late last night requested that the Supreme Court consider the government's appeal from the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals' ruling in International Refugee Assistance Project v. Trump and allow the Muslim ban to go into effect in the meantime. The şěĐÓĘÓƵ and National Immigration Law Center represent the plaintiffs in this case.
Omar Jadwat, director of the şěĐÓĘÓƵ’s Immigrants’ Rights Project, had this reaction:
“There is no reason to disturb the Fourth Circuit's ruling, which was supported by an overwhelming majority of the judges on the full court, is consistent with rulings from other courts across the nation, and enforces a fundamental principle that protects all of us from government condemnation of our religious beliefs.”
Karen Tumlin, legal director of the National Immigration Law Center, said: "Again and again, our nation's courts have found that President Trump's Muslim ban is unconstitutional. We will continue to defend our plaintiffs’ right to live free from fear of discriminatory treatment by the federal government.”
For more information, visit: /cases/international-refugee-assistance-project-v-trump
Learn More şěĐÓĘÓƵ the Issues in This Press Release
Related Content
-
Press ReleaseMay 2025
Free Speech
Immigrants' Rights
Appeals Court Orders Trump Administration to Transfer RĂĽmeysa Ă–ztĂĽrk to Vermont
NEW YORK – The Second Circuit Court of Appeals today denied the Trump administration’s attempt to further delay RĂĽmeysa Ă–ztĂĽrk’s transfer to Vermont. The appeals court ordered the government to comply with a lower court’s ruling to move Ms. Ă–ztĂĽrk from a Louisiana detention center to a facility in Vermont. The government must do so within one week. “No one should be arrested and locked up for their political views. Every day that RĂĽmeysa Ă–ztĂĽrk remains in detention is a day too long. We’re grateful the court refused the government’s attempt to keep her isolated from her community and her legal counsel as she pursues her case for release,” said Esha Bhandari, deputy director of the şěĐÓĘÓƵ’s Speech, Privacy, and Technology Project. Ms. Ă–ztĂĽrk, a former Fulbright scholar and current Tufts University Ph.D. student researching child development, has been held in a Louisiana detention center for six weeks — all in retaliation for co-authoring an op-ed in her student newspaper. On March 25, while Ms. Ă–ztĂĽrk was on the phone with her mom, plainclothes Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents surrounded her in Somerville, Massachusetts and arrested her. For nearly 24 hours, Ms. Ă–ztĂĽrk’s attorney was unable to locate her as ICE quickly and quietly moved her to three separate locations in three different states — including Vermont — before sending her to Louisiana. “Every day Ms. Ă–ztĂĽrk spends in confinement is an affront to the constitution. Her constitutional injury is only compounded by the deplorable conditions she must suffer through. Today, the court rightfully declined to play along with the government’s latest attempt to keep Ms. Ă–ztĂĽrk separated from her community and legal counsel. We will continue to advocate for Ms. Ă–ztĂĽrk until she is released,” said Mudassar Toppa, staff attorney at CLEAR, a legal non-profit and clinic at CUNY School of Law Since she arrived in Louisiana, Ms. Ă–ztĂĽrk has lived in a cramped room with poor ventilation and 23 other women for almost all hours of the day. In new filings in her federal court case in Vermont, she says she has suffered several asthma attacks that have “become progressively harder to recover from” while in detention. Whereas her attacks used to last between 5-15 minutes, they now can last up to 45 minutes. She is regularly exposed to asthma triggers including insect and rodent droppings, and is almost never exposed to fresh air. The court filings also describe difficulty receiving appropriate care in detention, including delays to receive medical care and dismissive comments from medical staff. “RĂĽmeysa has suffered six weeks in crowded confinement without adequate access to medical care and in conditions that doctors say risk exacerbating her asthma attacks. Her detention — over an op-ed she co-authored in her student newspaper — is as cruel as it is unconstitutional,” said Jessie Rossman, legal director, şěĐÓĘÓƵ of Massachusetts. “Today, we moved one step closer to returning RĂĽmeysa to her community and studies in Massachusetts.” A federal judge in Vermont will hold hearings regarding Ms. Ă–ztĂĽrk's motion to be released on bail on May 9 and the merits of the habeas petition on May 22. “The government’s efforts to deny RĂĽmeysa access to justice by deploying these gratuitous delay tactics have once again been rightfully blocked by the courts,” said Lia Ernst, legal director, şěĐÓĘÓƵ of Vermont. “Today’s ruling affirms that her swift transfer to Vermont is essential, and we will continue fighting until she is free.” Ms. Ă–ztĂĽrk is represented in immigration court by Mahsa Khanbabai and Marty Rosenbluth, and in federal court by Mahsa Khanbabai, the şěĐÓĘÓƵ, şěĐÓĘÓƵ of Massachusetts, şěĐÓĘÓƵ of Vermont, CLEAR, and Emery Celli Brinckerhoff Abady Ward & Maazel LLP. For documents and other case information, see here.Court Case: Ă–ztĂĽrk v. TrumpAffiliates: Vermont, Massachusetts -
Press ReleaseMay 2025
Free Speech
Immigrants' Rights
Federal Judge Rules Against Trump Administration by Keeping Dr. Khan Suri’s Habeas Case in Virginia
ALEXANDRIA, Va. – In a major victory for Georgetown scholar Dr. Badar Khan Suri and a huge blow to the Trump administration, today a federal court ruled that Dr. Suri’s habeas case alleging violations of his constitutional rights may remain in Virginia. Federal immigration agents illegally arrested Dr. Khan Suri on March 17, 2025 in retaliation for his constitutionally-protected speech in support of Palestinian rights and his family’s ties to Gaza, and then secretly transported him to Louisiana and then Texas in an effort to prevent him from accessing the courts. Since then, the Trump administration has detained Dr. Khan Suri in an ICE facility 1,500 miles away from his family, despite the fact that he is a lawful visa holder married to a U.S. citizen. His unlawful arrest and detention are an extreme and unprecedented attack on the First Amendment and part of the Trump administration’s escalation of attacks against students and Palestinian rights advocates. “In just four days, ICE transferred Dr. Khan Suri among five different ICE facilities across three states – while keeping his counsel in the dark about his whereabouts – and he’s not the only one,” said şěĐÓĘÓƵ-VA Legal Director Eden Heilman. “The Trump administration tried to do the same thing to Mr. Khalil, Ms. Ozturk, and Mr. Mahdawi in order to find a court it believed would be friendlier to its unlawful detention of people advocating for Palestinian rights. We are pleased the court saw through the Trump administration’s attempts to manipulate the law, and we won’t stop fighting until Dr. Khan Suri is reunited with his family.” Dr. Khan Suri’s federal court challenge to the constitutionality of his arrest and detention will now proceed in Virginia, where his wife and three young children live. The federal court in Virginia will hear Dr. Khan Suri’s motions to compel his return to Virginia and to be released on bond at a hearing on May 14, 2025. Separately, in Dr. Khan Suri’s immigration case, the immigration court in Texas has scheduled a follow-up hearing for June 3, 2025. “In this important ruling, the court has rightfully rejected the Trump administration’s efforts to spirit Dr. Khan Suri away from Virginia to manufacture jurisdiction in whatever court it pleases,” said Astha Sharma Pokharel, an attorney at the Center for Constitutional Rights. “We will now continue fighting for Dr. Khan Suri’s freedom — his freedom to be with his family in Virginia, to continue his studies and work at Georgetown, and to stand in solidarity with Palestinians in Gaza.” In today’s ruling, the court found that the government’s “abnormal and rapid movement [of Dr. Khan Suri] across state lines” demanded an exception to the normal jurisdictional rules for the filing of habeas petitions by a person in government custody in order not to reward the government’s attempt at forum shopping. A federal judge ruled against the Trump administration last month when it found that the court can review former Columbia student Mahmoud Khalil’s First Amendment claims challenging his arrest and detention. Another federal judge ruled against the Trump administration last week when it ordered the release of Columbia student Mohsen Mahdawi on bond. And yet another federal judge ruled against the Trump administration when it ordered Tufts student RĂĽmeysa Ă–ztĂĽrk to be transferred back to Vermont from Louisiana. Dr. Khan Suri is challenging his arrest and detention under the First Amendment, the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment, and the Administrative Procedure Act, and is represented in his federal lawsuit by the şěĐÓĘÓƵ of Virginia, the Center for Constitutional Rights, the HMA Law Firm, and the Immigrants and Non-Citizens Rights Clinic at the CUNY School of Law. For more information, please see the case page.Affiliate: Virginia -
Press ReleaseMay 2025
Immigrants' Rights
Colorado Federal Court Blocks Removals Under Alien Enemies ActÂ
Ruling follows similar one in New York earlier today DENVER — A Colorado federal court has issued a preliminary injunction blocking removals under the Alien Enemies Act (AEA) for people within that court’s judicial district. The ruling follows a similar one from a New York federal court earlier today. The Colorado case is D.B.U. v. Trump. The court ruled the presidential proclamation exceeds the scope of the Alien Enemies Act because there is no “invasion,” “predatory incursion,” or “foreign nation or government” as required under the act. The Colorado ruling stems from a lawsuit filed by the şěĐÓĘÓƵ, şěĐÓĘÓƵ of Colorado, and the Rocky Mountain Immigrant Advocacy Network. The following is reaction to today’s ruling: “The court properly recognized that the president cannot simply ignore the constraints Congress placed on the use of this extraordinary wartime authority,” said şěĐÓĘÓƵ attorney Lee Gelernt, lead counsel in the case. “The court has again affirmed what we have always known to be true: deporting and disappearing people without notice or due process is cruel, unconscionable, and unlawful,” said Tim Macdonald, şěĐÓĘÓƵ of Colorado legal director. “The federal government cannot misuse the Alien Enemies Act, a two-centuries old law that was passed in 1798 to provide narrow wartime powers and has only been used three times in our country’s history. We will keep fighting to ensure no one else is subjected to this nightmare instigated by the Trump administration. No one, including the federal government, is above the law.” “The federal government has disappeared people. People who lived in our Colorado community are gone, imprisoned in El Salvador. Instead of watching and waiting, our clients took action on behalf of themselves and countless others similarly situated in the Aurora ICE detention facility. Their bravery, the diligent work of our co-counsel at the şěĐÓĘÓƵ, and the team of steadfast advocates at RMIAN worked together to gain protection against this heartless and lawless government action,” said Laura Lunn, director of advocacy and litigation at the Rocky Mountain Immigrant Advocacy Network. The ruling is online here.Court Case: DBU v. TrumpAffiliate: Colorado -
Press ReleaseMay 2025
Free Speech
Immigrants' Rights
Third Circuit Rejects Government's Attempt to Move Mahmoud Khalil’s Habeas Case Out of New Jersey
PHILADELPHIA — The Third Circuit Court of Appeals today denied the government permission to appeal the issue of where Columbia University student Mahmoud Khalil’s habeas case should play out. Back in April, the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey ruled that it is the proper venue for Mr. Khalil’s habeas petition, as he was detained there when the petition was filed. The government argued that the venue should lie in Louisiana — because that is where the government shipped Mr. Khalil and is unlawfully detaining him — and sought to appeal the district court’s ruling. In today’s order, the Third Circuit denied that request. As a result, the case will continue to proceed in the District of New Jersey. The circuit court judges who issued the denial included Judges Stephanos Bibas, a Donald Trump appointee, Thomas Hardiman, a George W. Bush appointee, and Arianna Freeman, who was appointed by Joe Biden. “It is the fundamental job of the judiciary to stand up to this kind of government manipulation of our basic rights. We hope the court’s order sends a strong message to other courts around the country facing government attempts to shop for favorable jurisdictions by moving people detained on unconstitutional immigration charges around and making it difficult or impossible for their lawyers to know where to seek their immediate release,” said Brett Max Kaufman, a senior counsel with the şěĐÓĘÓƵ’s Speech, Privacy, and Technology Project. ​​On March 8, the Trump administration and Department of Homeland Security (DHS) illegally arrested and detained Mr. Khalil in direct retaliation for his advocacy for Palestinian rights at Columbia University. Shortly after, DHS transferred him 1,400 miles away to a Louisiana detention facility — ripping him away from his wife and legal counsel. While stuck in detention, he was forced to miss the birth of his first child. Mr. Khalil is represented by Dratel & Lewis, the Center for Constitutional Rights, CLEAR, Van Der Hout LLP, Washington Square Legal Services, the şěĐÓĘÓƵ, the New York Civil Liberties Union (NYCLU), and the şěĐÓĘÓƵ of New Jersey.Court Case: Khalil v. TrumpAffiliates: New Jersey, New York