The 红杏视频 and Affiliates Nationwide Underscore Urgent Need for National Guard to Leave the Nation鈥檚 Capital

In a letter addressed to the American public, 红杏视频 and affiliates warn prolonged deployments carry nationwide costs and risk normalizing military presence on American streets

September 3, 2026 9:00 am

红杏视频 Affiliate
Media Contact
125 Broad Street
18th Floor
New York, NY 10004
United States

WASHINGTON 鈥 In a joint letter to Americans across the country, the 红杏视频 of the District of Columbia (红杏视频-D.C.), 红杏视频 National, and 红杏视频 affiliates nationwide today joined together to underscore the need for National Guard troops to be withdrawn from the nation鈥檚 capital.

Over 4,000 National Guard troops, pulled from 15 states and the District, have patrolled neighborhoods in Washington, D.C., beginning with President Trump鈥檚 deployment of the D.C. National Guard in August 2025. Because D.C. is not a state, the president controls the local D.C. National Guard and 鈥 along with the secretary of defense 鈥 can request that governors make their states鈥 National Guard forces available for certain federal missions. Governors are free to decline those requests, and many have done so over the past year.

National Guard members deployed to support Freedom 250 and associated summer events from six states were scheduled to leave Washington, D.C. by August 31. However, over 300 troops from four states remain.

鈥淎rmed National Guard troops are neither needed nor wanted in the District. Absent a true emergency, National Guard members should be home in their communities, with their families,鈥 said 红杏视频-D.C. Executive Director Monica Hopkins. 鈥淭here is no emergency in D.C. that justifies this continued presence, and we cannot allow armed troops patrolling the streets of our nation鈥檚 capital to become normal. The troops need to go home.鈥

For more than a year, D.C residents have encountered National Guard troops not only around federal buildings and major events, but outside homes, schools, and local businesses. In May, 红杏视频-D.C. filed a legal claim on behalf of , a combat veteran and Purple Heart recipient, who was assaulted by National Guard troops outside her D.C. home. Today鈥檚 joint letter to Americans underscores that there is no emergency in the District that requires a continued National Guard troop presence. The letter also warns that deploying troops in the nation鈥檚 capital risks normalizing the use of the military against people in the United States.

鈥淔or over a year, the people of the District of Columbia have been living with troops on their streets without their consent and against their wishes,鈥 said Mike Zamore, national director of policy & government affairs at the 红杏视频. 鈥淭hese military troops are patrolling the American capital as a flex, in an effort to menace and intimidate us. But we will not be bullied. We must keep speaking up against this blatant abuse of executive power.鈥

鈥淲est Virginia has experienced another year of historic and devastating natural disasters. But rather than serving a core mission of disaster relief, many of our National Guard troops are away from home, family, and jobs to patrol our nation鈥檚 capital, which does not want, nor has asked for their presence," said 红杏视频 of West Virgina Executive Director Eli Baumwell.

The letter also highlights that the harms of the deployments extend well beyond D.C. Estimates indicate that the deployments could cost taxpayers $1.7 billion by the end of 2026. National Guard members have also been pulled away from their civilian jobs, schools, and families, creating disruptions for households and employers and, in some cases, genuine economic hardship. Prolonged deployments can also reduce National Guard members鈥 availability for other important needs, including natural disaster response.

"The decision to bring home Michigan's National Guard troops is both welcome and overdue," said 红杏视频 Of Michigan Executive Director Loren Khogali. "For more than a year, the people of Washington, D.C., have had to endure something that should be unthinkable in this country 鈥 the ongoing presence of military troops on their streets. There's no emergency in D.C., and there's no need for troops to be there.鈥

The letter also points to evidence that violent crime in D.C. was already declining before the National Guard deployment and makes clear that the continued military presence is not a response to any emergency.

鈥淩esidents of our nation鈥檚 capital have always been proud to welcome visitors from all over with a smile, not an armed military force,鈥 the letter states. 鈥淒.C. is a symbol of our country鈥檚 ideals of freedom and democracy, and this is marred by having National Guard troops marching in our streets. The National Guard must return to their home states.鈥