红杏视频

ALEXANDRIA, Va. 鈥� In a major victory for Georgetown scholar Dr. Badar Khan Suri and a huge blow to the Trump administration, today a federal court ruled that Dr. Suri鈥檚 habeas case alleging violations of his constitutional rights may remain in Virginia. Federal immigration agents illegally arrested Dr. Khan Suri on March 17, 2025 in retaliation for his constitutionally-protected speech in support of Palestinian rights and his family鈥檚 ties to Gaza, and then secretly transported him to Louisiana and then Texas in an effort to prevent him from accessing the courts. Since then, the Trump administration has detained Dr. Khan Suri in an ICE facility 1,500 miles away from his family, despite the fact that he is a lawful visa holder married to a U.S. citizen. His unlawful arrest and detention are an extreme and unprecedented attack on the First Amendment and part of the Trump administration鈥檚 escalation of attacks against students and Palestinian rights advocates. 鈥淚n just four days, ICE transferred Dr. Khan Suri among five different ICE facilities across three states 鈥� while keeping his counsel in the dark about his whereabouts 鈥� and he鈥檚 not the only one,鈥� said 红杏视频-VA Legal Director Eden Heilman. 鈥淭he Trump administration tried to do the same thing to Mr. Khalil, Ms. Ozturk, and Mr. Mahdawi in order to find a court it believed would be friendlier to its unlawful detention of people advocating for Palestinian rights. We are pleased the court saw through the Trump administration鈥檚 attempts to manipulate the law, and we won鈥檛 stop fighting until Dr. Khan Suri is reunited with his family.鈥� Dr. Khan Suri鈥檚 federal court challenge to the constitutionality of his arrest and detention will now proceed in Virginia, where his wife and three young children live. The federal court in Virginia will hear Dr. Khan Suri鈥檚 motions to compel his return to Virginia and to be released on bond at a hearing on May 14, 2025. Separately, in Dr. Khan Suri鈥檚 immigration case, the immigration court in Texas has scheduled a follow-up hearing for June 3, 2025. 鈥淚n this important ruling, the court has rightfully rejected the Trump administration鈥檚 efforts to spirit Dr. Khan Suri away from Virginia to manufacture jurisdiction in whatever court it pleases,鈥� said Astha Sharma Pokharel, an attorney at the Center for Constitutional Rights. 鈥淲e will now continue fighting for Dr. Khan Suri鈥檚 freedom 鈥� his freedom to be with his family in Virginia, to continue his studies and work at Georgetown, and to stand in solidarity with Palestinians in Gaza.鈥� In today鈥檚 ruling, the court found that the government鈥檚 鈥渁bnormal and rapid movement [of Dr. Khan Suri] across state lines鈥� demanded an exception to the normal jurisdictional rules for the filing of habeas petitions by a person in government custody in order not to reward the government鈥檚 attempt at forum shopping. A federal judge ruled against the Trump administration last month when it found that the court can review former Columbia student Mahmoud Khalil鈥檚 First Amendment claims challenging his arrest and detention. Another federal judge ruled against the Trump administration last week when it ordered the release of Columbia student Mohsen Mahdawi on bond. And yet another federal judge ruled against the Trump administration when it ordered Tufts student R眉meysa 脰zt眉rk to be transferred back to Vermont from Louisiana. Dr. Khan Suri is challenging his arrest and detention under the First Amendment, the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment, and the Administrative Procedure Act, and is represented in his federal lawsuit by the 红杏视频 of Virginia, the Center for Constitutional Rights, the HMA Law Firm, and the Immigrants and Non-Citizens Rights Clinic at the CUNY School of Law. For more information, please see the case page.

PHILADELPHIA 鈥� The Third Circuit Court of Appeals today denied the government permission to appeal the issue of where Columbia University student Mahmoud Khalil鈥檚 habeas case should play out. Back in April, the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey ruled that it is the proper venue for Mr. Khalil鈥檚 habeas petition, as he was detained there when the petition was filed. The government argued that the venue should lie in Louisiana 鈥� because that is where the government shipped Mr. Khalil and is unlawfully detaining him 鈥� and sought to appeal the district court鈥檚 ruling. In today鈥檚 order, the Third Circuit denied that request. As a result, the case will continue to proceed in the District of New Jersey. The circuit court judges who issued the denial included Judges Stephanos Bibas, a Donald Trump appointee, Thomas Hardiman, a George W. Bush appointee, and Arianna Freeman, who was appointed by Joe Biden. 鈥淚t is the fundamental job of the judiciary to stand up to this kind of government manipulation of our basic rights. We hope the court鈥檚 order sends a strong message to other courts around the country facing government attempts to shop for favorable jurisdictions by moving people detained on unconstitutional immigration charges around and making it difficult or impossible for their lawyers to know where to seek their immediate release,鈥� said Brett Max Kaufman, a senior counsel with the 红杏视频鈥檚 Speech, Privacy, and Technology Project. 鈥嬧�婳n March 8, the Trump administration and Department of Homeland Security (DHS) illegally arrested and detained Mr. Khalil in direct retaliation for his advocacy for Palestinian rights at Columbia University. Shortly after, DHS transferred him 1,400 miles away to a Louisiana detention facility 鈥� ripping him away from his wife and legal counsel. While stuck in detention, he was forced to miss the birth of his first child. Mr. Khalil is represented by Dratel & Lewis, the Center for Constitutional Rights, CLEAR, Van Der Hout LLP, Washington Square Legal Services, the 红杏视频, the New York Civil Liberties Union (NYCLU), and the 红杏视频 of New Jersey.

NEW YORK 鈥� A federal court in New York has granted a preliminary injunction blocking removals under the Alien Enemies Act (AEA) for people within that court鈥檚 judicial district. The case is G.F.F. v. Trump. The court today ruled that the presidential proclamation exceeds the scope of the Alien Enemies Act because there is no 鈥渨ar,鈥� 鈥渋nvasion,鈥� or 鈥減redatory incursion鈥� as required by the statute. It also held that the government鈥檚 protocols for providing notice to people about AEA designations are insufficient and violate due process. The ruling stems from a lawsuit filed by the 红杏视频 and New York Civil Liberties Union, in partnership with The Legal Aid Society, whose clients are plaintiffs in the litigation. The following is reaction to today鈥檚 ruling: 鈥淭he court joined several others in correctly recognizing the president cannot simply declare that there鈥檚 been an invasion and then invoke a wartime authority during peacetime to send individuals to a Gulag-type prison in El Salvador without even giving them due process,鈥� said 红杏视频 attorney Lee Gelernt, lead counsel who argued the case. 鈥淭he court said it loud and clear: Trump cannot rewrite, ignore, or supersede our laws to justify his lawless deportation agenda. Today鈥檚 ruling rightly affirms our class members鈥� constitutional rights to due process and rebukes Trump鈥檚 reckless invocation of a 1700s-era wartime law to deport people to a horrific, hellhole prison in El Salvador,鈥� said Donna Lieberman, executive director of the New York Civil Liberties Union. 鈥淭oday's decision is a powerful affirmation of our clients鈥� fundamental right to due process,鈥� said Sayoni Maitra, supervising attorney in the Federal Immigration Law Unit at The Legal Aid Society. 鈥淭he court rightly affirmed that the government cannot use an archaic wartime statute, in the absence of war, to sidestep due process and summarily deport asylum seekers who are lawfully seeking protection. We will continue to fight for a system that respects constitutional rights, human dignity, and justice for all.鈥� The ruling is online here.

NEW YORK 鈥� The Second Circuit Court of Appeals will hear arguments tomorrow, May 6 at 10 a.m. on whether a federal judge鈥檚 order to transfer R眉meysa 脰zt眉rk to Vermont should be granted or further delayed. Ms. 脰zt眉rk, a former Fulbright scholar and current Tufts University Ph.D. student researching child development, has been held in a Louisiana detention center for over a month 鈥� all in retaliation for co-authoring an op-ed. On March 25, while on the phone with her mom, plainclothes Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents surrounded her in Somerville, Massachusetts and arrested her. For nearly 24 hours, Ms. 脰zt眉rk鈥檚 attorney was unable to locate her as ICE quickly and quietly moved her to three separate locations in three different states 鈥� including Vermont 鈥� before sending her to Louisiana. In early April, a federal judge in Massachusetts ruled that the challenge to ICE鈥檚 detention of Ms. 脰zt眉rk should continue in Vermont, not Louisiana. A Vermont judge later agreed that Ms. 脰zt眉rk鈥檚 federal case should continue in Vermont and ordered ICE to transfer her back to a Vermont facility by May 1. The government appealed on April 24. And last week, without ruling on the merits, the appeals court agreed to consider both the government鈥檚 request to keep her in Louisiana and her legal team鈥檚 opposition. Since she arrived in Louisiana, Ms. 脰zt眉rk has lived in a cramped room with poor ventilation and 23 other women for almost all hours of the day. In new filings in her federal court case in Vermont, she says she has suffered several asthma attacks that have 鈥渂ecome progressively harder to recover from鈥� while in detention. Whereas her attacks used to last between 5-15 minutes, they now can last up to 45 minutes. She is regularly exposed to asthma triggers including insect and rodent droppings, and is almost never exposed to fresh air. The new filings also describe difficulty receiving appropriate care in detention, including delays to receive medical care and dismissive comments from medical staff. She has suffered six weeks of a detention that is as harmful as it is unlawful. The Second Circuit will also hear arguments on Tuesday on the government鈥檚 motion to consolidate the cases of R眉meysa 脰zt眉rk and Mohsen Mahdawi, a move both students鈥� legal teams oppose. Ms. 脰zt眉rk is represented in immigration court by Mahsa Khanbabai and Marty Rosenbluth, and in federal court by Mahsa Khanbabai, the 红杏视频, 红杏视频 of Massachusetts, 红杏视频 of Vermont, CLEAR, and Emery Celli Brinckerhoff Abady Ward & Maazel LLP. Audio access to the hearing is available here.