红杏视频

The 红杏视频, New York Civil Liberties Union, 红杏视频 of Southern California, and 红杏视频 of Northern California filed an amicus brief in the New York Court of Appeals arguing that the New York Voting Rights Act is constitutional legislation designed to combat and remedy modern forms of discrimination in voting affecting New York. At stake in this case is whether New York鈥檚 courts uphold the State legislature鈥檚 decision to protect the freedom to vote for all New Yorkers by ensuring voters are not subjected to discrimination when participating in the political process.

In November 2022, thousands of Pennsylvania voters were denied the right to vote based on a meaningless paperwork error. They filled out their mail ballots, signed the form on the outer return envelope, and returned their ballots on time. Yet their ballots were not counted, because they either forgot to write the date on their return envelope, or they accidentally wrote the wrong date. We're fighting to make sure that every vote counts

BIRMINGHAM, AL 鈥� In a mixed ruling on Alabama鈥檚 state Senate redistricting case, a federal court has found that the state鈥檚 map violates the Voting Rights Act in Montgomery but upheld the current map makeup in the Huntsville area. The decision is an important victory for Black voters, though advocates stress that Alabama still has work to do to ensure its maps provide fair representation. The lawsuit, filed by the 红杏视频, 红杏视频 of Alabama, Legal Defense Fund, and Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) argued that Alabama鈥檚 2021 State Senate districting plan artificially diluted the political power of Black Alabamians by cracking significant Black communities in the Huntsville area and packing Black voters in unnecessarily large numbers into one State Senate district in the Montgomery area. The combination of these districting lines with the ongoing effects of racial discrimination means that these districts resulted in Black residents of these areas having an unequal opportunity to elect their preferred candidates to the state Senate. The court鈥檚 decision requires Alabama to redraw the Montgomery-area Senate district but leaves the Huntsville districts intact. "This decision proves that when we challenge injustice, we can make progress. Alabama must now draw fairer districts in Montgomery, but let鈥檚 be clear鈥攍eaving Huntsville untouched still denies many Black Alabamians their rightful representation,鈥� said Benard Simelton, president of the Alabama State Conference of the NAACP. 鈥淲e celebrate this win while demanding the state finish the job and deliver maps that reflect the full power of our communities." 鈥淲e are pleased that the court recognized the injustice in Montgomery and is requiring Alabama to fix its unlawful redistricting,鈥� said Davin Rosborough, deputy director of the 红杏视频鈥檚 voting rights project. 鈥淲hile we are disappointed that Black voters in Huntsville will continue to be denied fair representation, the fight is far from over.鈥� 鈥淭oday鈥檚 decision is a hard-fought victory for Black voters in Montgomery who deserve fair representation in the Alabama Senate,鈥� said Deuel Ross, Director of Litigation at LDF. 鈥淭he court's decision recognizes that, even today, the State continues its terrible history of discriminating against Black voters. While we welcome this win, leaving the Huntsville district in place illustrates that voters must continue to fight for their voices to be heard.鈥� 鈥淭his decision isn鈥檛 simply a victory for Black voters in Alabama, but all voters in the state. The courts have reviewed the evidence and concluded that the Alabama State Legislature systematically diluted the voting power of Black Alabamians by drawing unfair districts,鈥� said Jack Genberg, Senior Supervising Attorney, Democracy and Voting Rights Litigation Team, Southern Poverty Law Center. 鈥淭his ruling underscores the urgent need to reform our redistricting process and restore meaningful voter participation to ensure fair and equitable rights for all people of this state.鈥� Read the full ruling here: https://assets.aclu.org/live/uploads/2025/08/AL-NAACP-v.-Allen.pdf  

OXFORD, Miss. 鈥� A federal court today ruled that Mississippi鈥檚 Supreme Court district lines must be redrawn to ensure Black voters have an equal opportunity to elect candidates of their choice. The 红杏视频, 红杏视频 of Mississippi, Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC), and Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP brought the challenge on behalf of individual Black civic leaders, including business and civic leader Dyamone White; Ty Pinkins, a 20-year Army veteran and Georgetown Law graduate; educator Constance Slaughter Harvey-Burwell; and Mississippi Senate Minority Leader Derrick Simmons of Greenville. At trial, Plaintiffs successfully argued the current district lines severely diluted the voting strength of Black residents in state Supreme Court elections, in violation of the Voting Rights Act of 1965. Under the challenged lines, the state鈥檚 nine-member Supreme Court has had only four Black justices in its entire history, each one appointed in succession by the governor to the same seat. Mississippi is nearly forty percent Black by population. The Supreme Court district lines have remained almost entirely unchanged for over a century save for a minor shift of four counties in 1987. They cut the historically Black Mississippi Delta region in half, preventing the candidates preferred by Black voters from being elected. The Mississippi Legislature will be tasked with implementing the court鈥檚 order by drawing new district lines that provide Black voters with a full and fair opportunity to elect candidates of choice. The following is reaction to today鈥檚 ruling: 鈥淭his win corrects a historic injustice,鈥� said Ari Savitzky, senior staff attorney with the 红杏视频鈥檚 Voting Rights Project. 鈥淎ll Mississippians will benefit from fair district lines that give Black voters an equal voice 鈥� and new generations of Black leaders an equal chance to help shape the state鈥檚 future by serving on the state鈥檚 highest court.鈥� 鈥淭hroughout our state鈥檚 history, Black voters have been boxed out from choosing justices who make decisions about our lives and our rights,鈥� said business and civic leader Dyamone White, lead Plaintiff. 鈥淭oday鈥檚 ruling restores hope that Mississippi鈥檚 future will be guided by a judiciary chosen by all of the people鈥攏ot just some. This victory is bigger than me鈥攊t鈥檚 a powerful affirmation of fair representation." 鈥淭his ruling is a historic victory for fairness and justice in Mississippi,鈥� said Senator Derrick T. Simmons, Mississippi Senate Minority Leader. 鈥淔or too long, the lines for our Supreme Court districts diluted the voices of Black voters and denied them a fair opportunity to elect candidates of their choice. The court鈥檚 decision affirms what we have long known鈥攖hat our democracy works best when every community has equal representation. This ruling is not just a win for the other plaintiffs and me, but for every Mississippian who believes in the fundamental promise of equal justice under the law.鈥� 鈥淭oday鈥檚 win is a victory for all Mississippians. Our state succeeds when it embraces its diversity and welcomes all voices. This ruling acknowledges that the current Supreme Court district lines silence too many Black Mississippians. Thanks to this federal court鈥檚 decision, Black voters will have a more equal say in who serves on our state鈥檚 highest court,鈥� said Jarvis Dortch, executive director of the 红杏视频 of Mississippi. "All Mississippians deserve the right to have their vote counted. This victory is a great leap forward for protecting the most fundamental right in this nation, voting," said Ahmed Soussi, senior staff attorney at the SPLC. "Black voters will now have an equal voice in shaping and forming the highest court in the Magnolia State. We look forward to the redistricting process and ensuring a fair map is passed." 鈥淰oting is the cornerstone of a functioning democracy. This decision affirms that principle by recognizing the importance of fair and legal districting. All Mississippi citizens must have a full and fair opportunity to shape the judiciary that serves them,鈥� said Jon Youngwood, Co-Chair of Simpson Thacher鈥檚 Litigation Department. This ruling can be found online here: https://assets.aclu.org/live/uploads/2025/08/2025.08.19.d-ORDER-AND.pdf