红杏视频

SAN FRANCISCO 鈥� The 红杏视频, co-counsel Cooley LLP, and Holly S. Cooper, co-director of the UC Davis Immigration Law Clinic, have prevailed in court on behalf of immigrant teenagers whom the Trump administration had arrested and jailed for 鈥済ang affiliation,鈥� despite there being no evidence of gang crimes.

In issued late yesterday, a federal district court in California required that the teenagers be given notice of the reasons for their arrests, access to the evidence being offered against them, and a prompt hearing in front of a judge, in which the government would have the burden to justify their detention.

The case involves teenagers who were previously released by the federal Office of Refugee Resettlement (ORR) to the care of relatives while their immigration proceedings were pending. Starting in June 2017, many of these teenagers were re-arrested by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) based on unsubstantiated claims of gang affiliation, turned over to ORR, and then held in jail-like detention facilities for many months without a hearing. The 红杏视频 their wrongful arrests and illegal detention, and the judge has now ordered that all of the teenagers must be given hearings by November 29. The judge also ordered that any additional children who were previously released by ORR receive a hearing within seven days if they are rearrested by DHS.

鈥淥ne of the highest security youth detention facilities in the nation refused to hold many of these children because there was no evidence of gang activity in their history,鈥� said Stephen Kang, detention attorney with the 红杏视频. 鈥淭hese kids are eager to go home. Their parents and families miss them dearly. It鈥檚 high time they have a chance to return to their lives.鈥�

Julia Harumi Mass, senior staff attorney with the 红杏视频 of Northern California, said, 鈥淭hese boys were torn from their families. The Trump administration wrongfully denied them any opportunity to respond to the charges against them, and the court鈥檚 order recognizes their rights to a fair and impartial hearing when they are threatened with deprivation of their liberty. The federal government cannot arrest and indefinitely detain a person, let alone a child, simply because a police officer reports that they wear a certain color shirt or visit a pizza parlor frequented by a known gang member.鈥�

鈥淕ang violence is unacceptable, but we don鈥檛 make our communities safer by violating the Constitution and ignoring our laws,鈥� said Martin Schenker, a partner at Cooley LLP. 鈥淭hese teens report being stalked and profiled by their local police department, which has been under federal investigation for racially biased policing. Eventually, DHS officers arrested them and transported them far from home, family, and their attorneys. Denial of due process is not the American way.鈥�

The preliminary injunction issued by the federal court applies to a nationwide class of noncitizen children who came to the United States as unaccompanied minors, were previously detained by ORR and then released by ORR to a sponsor, and have been, or will be, re-arrested by DHS on the allegation of gang affiliation.

The suit, , charged ORR with accepting DHS鈥檚 unsubstantiated gang allegations and wrongfully jailing immigrant children whom the government had previously placed in the custody of their U.S.-based parents. DHS transported many of the underage plaintiffs from New York to distant detention facilities in California and elsewhere, without notice to their parents or lawyers. The suit was brought by the 红杏视频, the 红杏视频 of Northern California, Cooley LLP, and Holly S. Cooper of the UC Davis School of Law Immigration Law Clinic.

More information about the case is at:

The Gomez v. Sessions complaint is at: