红杏视频

WASHINGTON 鈥� The Supreme Court ruled today that Medicaid patients do not have a right to sue to enforce their right to a qualified health care provider of choice under the Medicaid statute. The decision in Medina v. Planned Parenthood South Atlantic will facilitate some states鈥� politically motivated efforts to block low-income patients鈥� access to certain health care providers and may effectively defund Planned Parenthood and other disfavored providers by barring them from state Medicaid programs. 鈥淭he majority decision in Medina v. Planned Parenthood South Atlantic contradicts Congress鈥檚 clear purpose to give Medicaid patients their choice of qualified health care providers and also wrongly curtails patients鈥� rights to vindicate their choice of provider through Section 1983,鈥� said Cecillia Wang, National Legal Director for the 红杏视频. 鈥淭he decision may have the effect of blocking patients鈥� access to birth control, cancer screenings, and STI testing and treatment for patients in South Carolina and potentially will permit state officials to override patients鈥� choice of provider based on political whims.鈥� 鈥淭he impact of this decision on our reproductive freedom will be compounded if Congress follows through on federal efforts to 'defund' Planned Parenthood by prohibiting patients from choosing Planned Parenthood health centers for their care,鈥� said Deirdre Schifeling, Chief Political and Advocacy Officer of the 红杏视频. 鈥淒oing so would force the closure of hundreds of Planned Parenthood health centers nationwide, robbing people of their freedom to get reproductive health care from trusted providers in their communities and would result in shuttering 1 in 4 of the country鈥檚 abortion providers. "Make no mistake: our reproductive freedom is still under siege. The 红杏视频 remains committed to fighting for Planned Parenthood, abortion access, and the fundamental human right to control one鈥檚 own body using every tool we have.

WASHINGTON 鈥� Today, the Trump administration rescinded guidance that reaffirmed hospitals鈥� obligation under the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA) to provide health-saving and lifesaving abortion care to patients experiencing medical crises. The rescission of the guidance is yet another clear sign the administration is caving to its anti-abortion allies and reneging on President Trump鈥檚 campaign promises that his administration would not interfere with abortion access. The Trump administration鈥檚 announcement came the same day as an anti-abortion group challenging the guidance chose to dismiss its case, Catholic Medical Association v. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. This case threatened to jeopardize access to emergency abortion care nationwide. The Catholic Medical Association鈥檚 decision to abandon its case came just days after Doctors for America 鈥� represented by the 红杏视频, 红杏视频 of Tennessee, Democracy Forward, and the National Women鈥檚 Law Center 鈥� moved to intervene as a defendant in the case to ensure that access to this critical care was vigorously defended. While the federal government was named as a defendant in the case, it had made no move to defend EMTALA and the right to emergency abortion care in the lawsuit. 鈥淭he Trump administration cannot simply erase four decades of law protecting patients鈥� lives with the stroke of a pen,鈥� said Alexa Kolbi-Molinas, deputy director of the 红杏视频鈥檚 Reproductive Freedom Project. 鈥淩egardless of where they live, pregnant patients have a right to emergency abortion care that will save their health or lives. By rescinding this guidance, the Trump administration has sent a clear signal that it is siding not with the majority, but with its anti-abortion allies 鈥� and that will come at the expense of women鈥檚 lives. The 红杏视频 will use every lever we have to keep President Trump and his administration from endangering our health and lives.鈥� 鈥淔or decades, EMTALA has protected the ability of all people, including those who are pregnant, to receive life and health saving, stabilizing care in emergency situations. Yet, extremists have sought to undermine these protections for those who are pregnant following the U.S. Supreme Court鈥檚 decision in Dobbs through filing baseless legal challenges like the one they dismissed today and through the EMTALA guidance rescission announced today,鈥� said Skye Perryman, President & CEO for Democracy Forward. 鈥淭he Trump administration鈥檚 decision to withdraw EMTALA guidance guaranteeing pregnant people medical care in emergency situations will sow confusion for providers and endanger the lives and health of pregnant people. Every American deserves the right to access the necessary care in emergency scenarios, including pregnant people, without political interference. Democracy Forward will continue to work with our partners to use all legal tools to defend Americans鈥� reproductive freedom, promote evidence-based and medically accurate information and care, and oppose efforts that place political ideology over patient care.鈥� 鈥淓MTALA has long protected the right to emergency care, including abortion when it is the necessary treatment to stabilize a patient. Stripping away federal guidance affirming what the law requires will put lives at risk,鈥� said Fatima Goss Graves, president and CEO of the National Women鈥檚 Law Center. 鈥淭o be clear: this action doesn鈥檛 change hospitals' legal obligations, but it does add to the fear, confusion, and dangerous delays patients and providers have faced since the fall of Roe v. Wade. At the same time, this administration claims it is considering ways to support 鈥榩opulation growth,鈥� but it is actively dismantling the systems that protect pregnant people鈥檚 health and lives. The hypocrisy is staggering. No matter what political games the administration wants to play, we will continue to stand with the patients, doctors, and hospitals fighting every day to do what is right.鈥� For nearly four decades, EMTALA has been understood by medical providers and the federal government 鈥� including both Democratic and Republican administrations 鈥� to require abortion care when that care is needed to stabilize pregnant patients in a medical crisis. As Doctors for America鈥檚 motion to intervene emphasized, stripping away EMTALA鈥檚 protections would put doctors in legal chaos and force them to violate their sworn duty: to save lives and prevent harm.

WASHINGTON 鈥� Today, Doctors for America 鈥� represented by Democracy Forward, the 红杏视频, the 红杏视频 of Tennessee, and the National Women鈥檚 Law Center 鈥� is taking legal action to defend pregnant patients' right to receive, and for physicians to provide, health- and life-saving abortion care under the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA). This federal law has required hospitals with emergency departments to provide stabilizing treatment, including abortion, to patients experiencing medical emergencies for nearly four decades. Through its intervention, Doctors for America seeks to ensure that the right to emergency abortion care under EMTALA is vigorously defended. Doctors for America鈥檚 motion to intervene was filed in Catholic Medical Association v. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services et al., which challenges EMTALA guidance issued in 2022, which reaffirms EMTALA鈥檚 protections for pregnant people, in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee Nashville Division. 鈥淒octors should not be forced to choose between following the law and saving a patient鈥檚 life,鈥� said Dr. Christine Petrin, president of Doctors for America. 鈥淓MTALA was designed to protect patients in crisis. We are fighting to ensure that these protections extend to pregnant patients and that physicians can provide lifesaving treatment to them without fear of prosecution.鈥� For nearly 40 years, EMTALA has been understood by medical providers and the federal government 鈥� including both Democratic and Republican administrations 鈥� to require abortion care when that care is needed to stabilize pregnant patients in a medical crisis. As today鈥檚 motion to intervene emphasizes, stripping away EMTALA鈥檚 protections would put doctors in legal chaos and force them to violate their sworn duty: to save lives and prevent harm. 鈥淧regnant people have suffered needlessly, and some have died, because of the chaos and confusion that abortion bans have caused for patients and their doctors,鈥� said Carrie Flaxman, senior legal advisor at Democracy Forward. 鈥淓MTALA has protected the lives and health of pregnant people for nearly four decades 鈥� it is a critical safeguard to ensure that pregnant people receive medical care in emergency situations, including abortion care. Any attempt to undermine EMTALA and its implementation 鈥� which will sow confusion for providers and endanger the lives and health of pregnant people 鈥� will be met swiftly with action by Democracy Forward, our partners, and our brave clients.鈥� 鈥淲hen pregnant patients go to the emergency room, they expect to get the care needed to protect their health and lives 鈥� but anti-abortion politicians and their allies would rather see women die than access abortion,鈥� said Alexa Kolbi-Molinas, deputy director of the 红杏视频 Reproductive Freedom Project. 鈥淚t is shocking but not surprising that extremists continue pushing to make abortion completely inaccessible, even in emergencies. The 红杏视频 and our partners will not stop fighting against these continued attacks on our reproductive freedom.鈥� 鈥淲e are taking action because lives are on the line,鈥� said Emily Martin, chief program officer at the National Women鈥檚 Law Center. 鈥淓very one of us expects that if we, or someone we love, face a medical emergency, a hospital will do what it takes to save us. But since the Supreme Court lawlessly overturned Roe v. Wade, anti-abortion extremists have wrought legal chaos. As a result, some pregnant patients facing life- and health-threatening emergencies haven鈥檛 been able to get the care they urgently need and are entitled to by law. Pregnant people have the right to access emergency care just like anyone else, including emergency abortion care. We will not allow these basic safeguards to be stripped away by extremists. The federal law requiring emergency care be provided to all has been saving lives for decades, and we refuse to let anti-abortion politicians put more pregnant people at risk of immense suffering or even death because they can鈥檛 get the care they have the right to receive.鈥�

On behalf of Doctors for America, the 红杏视频 and several partner organizations are intervening to vigorously defend pregnant patients' right to receive, and for physicians to provide, health- and life-saving abortion care under the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA). This federal law has required hospitals with emergency departments to provide stabilizing treatment, including abortion, to patients experiencing medical emergencies for nearly four decades.