红杏视频

WASHINGTON 鈥� In a 5-4 ruling, the Supreme Court today reversed a decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in Nielsen v. Preap. The 红杏视频 represented immigrants who challenged the federal government鈥檚 sweeping interpretation of a 1996 law, arguing it expanded mandatory detention far beyond what Congress intended, resulting in gross violations of due process for thousands of immigrants.

The court held that the mandatory detention statute, which plainly provides for detention without any hearing 鈥渨hen鈥� an immigrant 鈥渋s released鈥� from a prior criminal custody, applies even when immigration agents arrest individuals years after their release.

红杏视频 Deputy Legal Director Cecillia Wang, who argued the case, had this reaction:

鈥淔or two terms in a row now, the Supreme Court has endorsed the most extreme interpretation of immigration detention statutes, allowing mass incarceration of people without any hearing, simply because they are defending themselves against a deportation charge. We will continue to fight the gross overuse of detention in the immigration system.鈥�

The 红杏视频 brought Preap along with Asian Americans Advancing Justice鈥揂sian Law Caucus, the 红杏视频 of Northern California, Keker, Van Nest & Peters, LLP, and Lucas Guttentag. The 红杏视频 brought a companion case, Nielsen v. Khoury, along with the Northwest Immigrant Rights Project, the 红杏视频 of Washington, and the law firms of Gibbs Houston Pauw and Sunbird Law PLLC.

The ruling is at: /legal-document/nielsen-v-preap-supreme-court-opinion

More information is at: /cases/nielsen-v-preap