Thursdayâs hearing in Afghan national Mohammed Jawadâs case brought stunning testimony on serious abuse he suffered at Bagram Air Base in Afghanistan as a teenager, as well as military psychologistsâ role in crafting abusive interrogation methods for use on Jawad and other prisoners at GuantĂĄnamo Bay.
On Thursday Special Agent Angela Birt, an Army Criminal Investigation Division (CID) investigator who investigated , took the stand. Her investigation resulted in confessions from 18 military police for their role in abusing prisoners and findings of probable cause to charge 27 officers for the homicides. Birtâs investigation led her to Jawad because he had been imprisoned at Bagram at the time of the two homicides. Her investigation also uncovered a widespread pattern of abuse that corroborates Jawadâs claims of mistreatment at Bagram prison.
Birt testified that the types of abuse Jawad told her he sufferedâbeing forced to stand for long periods of time in stress positions; forced sleep deprivation; being hit, kicked and beaten; being shackled to the door of his cell; and being hooded and shackled with hand irons, leg irons and a waist chain while moved and in one case pushed down the stairsâmirrored other Bagram detaineesâ claims. She also said that Jawadâs claim that he heard the cries and screams of other detainees was a âfairly commonâ claim of other prisoners locked in isolation who heard other prisoners âcrying for their parents and begging for the beatings to stopâ during interrogations nearby.
Birt testified that the period of time Jawad was at Bagramâthe same period in which these two homicides occurred and the period chronicled in the documentary film Taxi to the Dark Side ââwas the worst period of abuse Iâve ever seenâ in the 2,000 cases she's investigated in her 18-year career at CID.
The methods Birt uncovered at Bagram were part of a menu of abusive Survival, Evasion, Resistance, and Escape (SERE) interrogation techniques also used on prisoners at GuantĂĄnamo Bay. Thursdayâs hearing in Jawadâs case brought attention to the role of military psychologists belonging to Behavioral Science Consultation Teams (BSCTs), known as âBiscuit teams,â in developing and refining these abusive techniques for use at GuantĂĄnamo Bay. Since 2002 BSCT psychologists have evaluated prisonersâ fears and psychological weaknesses to craft individualized blueprints for torture and other mistreatment, which they passed on to the interrogators. For instance, a GuantĂĄnamo psychiatrist advised interrogators to by deliberately keeping him almost totally in the dark.
Earlier media reports (see , , and , and a article revealed, and recent revelations from a , that military psychologists contributed to the development of these abusive interrogation methods.
Sadly, Thursdayâs hearing did not add much to the public record on the workings of the BSCT program at GuantĂĄnamo Bay. The BSCT psychologist, "Lt. Col. Z," who was scheduled to testify for the defense today, invoked her right to remain silentâpresumably because she feared recounting her role could incriminate herself in criminal activity. Her testimony would have been the first time a member of the BSCT team had testified in a military commissions hearing.
What we already knew was that leaked GuantĂĄnamo Bay interrogation logsâwhich âshow that a BSCT psychologist was present during the highly abusive interrogation of GuantĂĄnamo prisoner Mohammed al-Qahtani. (Charges against al-Quatani were suddenly dropped in May, because a trial would have turned the spotlight to the torture he endured at GuantĂĄnamo Bay.) And BSCT psychologistsâ role in aiding torture has been the subject of much controversy among the American Psychological Association (APA), which is holding a among its members to .
What we did learn Thursday was that, according to Jawadâs defense attorney Maj. Frakt, in September 2003, âwhen an interrogator observed Mohammad talking to posters on the wall of the interrogation room and was concerned about his mental health,â instead of calling a mental health professional to care for him, they summoned the BSCT team, whose psychologist made a âcruel and heartless assessment and recommendations.â Maj. Frakt called the BSCT psychologistâs report, which was classified secret and therefore not discussed in detail in the open court session, âthe most chilling document of all.â
And on Wednesday, Dr. Bruce Menely, the chief medical officer at GuantĂĄnamo Bay, testified that when Jawad tried to hang himself only months later, on Christmas Day 2003, BSCT psychologistsânot regular medical psychologistsâwere notified of Jawadâs suicide attempt. In Omar Khadrâs hearing Wednesday, Khadrâs defense lawyer Lt. Cmdr. William C. Kuebler noted that, much like in Jawadâs case, military psychologists have met with Khadr to manipulate him and extract more information from him during interrogations.
During his emotional closing argument Thursday, Maj. Frakt asked, âWhat has this country come to when a licensed psychologist, a senior officer in the U.S. Armed Forces, someone trained in the art of healing broken hearts and mending broken minds, someone with a duty to do no harm, turns her years of training and education to the art of breaking people, to the intentional devastation of a lonely, homesick teenage boy?â
At the end of her examination of Birt, defense attorney Katharine Doxakis asked Birt whether her resignation from the military was because she had become disillusioned with the military after seeing the results of her Bagram abuse investigation. The prosecutionâs immediate objection was sustained, and Birt never got to answer the question.
If, as implied by the defense, Birtâs resignation from the military was a stand against torture, why didnât GuantĂĄnamoâs militaryâs psychologists do the same?