You Have a Right to Know How Trump’s Muslim Ban Was Implemented. So We Sued.


Extensive questions surround the chaos that erupted nationwide in response to President Trump’s first “Muslim ban.” Because the government has refused to hand over information that would allow the public to evaluate how the ban was implemented, Ƶ affiliates have filed dozens of lawsuits around the country to demand details.
On January 27, President Trump signed Executive Order 13769, indefinitely blocking refugees from Syria from entering the United States, barring all refugees from resettlement for 120 days, and prohibiting nationals of seven predominantly Muslim countries from entering the United States for 90 days.
Chaos immediately erupted at airports, courtrooms, and political offices around the country. Dozens of refugees and travelers were with little to no explanation, denied access to lawyers, and in some cases put on return flights back to harm’s way.
As this crisis unfolded, U.S. Customs and Border Protection and the Department of Homeland Security issued contradictory statements, fueling mass confusion. The agencies claim that by the Trump administration. Reports confirmed that DHS Secretary John Kelly of the Muslim ban until after the executive order was signed.
DHS’s attempts to clarify the terms of the ban nationally only perpetuated the confusion. On Saturday, January 28, DHS declared that green card holders ; by Sunday, January 29, government officials had “clarified” that the Executive Order . Unsurprisingly, CBP’s local implementation of the Muslim ban in different international airports varied widely: While some agents aggressively tried to strip travelers of green cards, others hesitated, unsure which travelers were to be permitted entry and which were to be refused.
Perhaps most troubling, CBP officers apparently ignored the express terms of several federal . At Dulles airport, for example, Democratic members of the House of Representatives had to that refugee detainees subject to Trump’s ban be released. Similarly, when refugee advocates at JFK airport asked why the court orders that blocked the ban from taking place weren’t being enforced, some CBP officers replied:
This confusion had serious human impacts. In Texas, a was detained for 15 hours after traveling to Dallas Fort Worth airport on a Special Immigrant Visa that was awarded to him because of his work with the U.S. Army. In Virginia, when the first executive order took effect had their visas revoked upon landing and were required to fly back to Ethiopia. In New York, were subjected to extensive delays, detention, and distress at JFK airport after returning from vacation in Iran.
To clarify the public’s understanding of these urgent developments, 50 Ƶ affiliates filed Freedom of Information Act requests on February 2. Yet more than two months later, neither DHS nor CBP has provided us with any information about their local implementation of the executive order.
FOIA’s purpose is to ensure that people have timely access to crucial government information. The public has a right to know how CBP officers have implemented the Muslim ban locally. We deserve to have access to that information now.
Dozens of Ƶ affiliates across the country filed coordinated lawsuits yesterday demanding responses to our FOIA requests. Each lawsuit seeks unique, local information from CBP field offices, to clarify the public’s understanding of how CBP officers in each jurisdiction implemented the Muslim ban in the face of rapidly evolving and sometimes conflicting national guidance.
Democracy withers without government accountability, and accountability requires transparency. The government has a duty to keep the American people informed. This is particularly true for agencies like CBP, which have terrible transparency track records the lives of immigrants and refugees with impunity. Stay tuned.