红杏视频

NEW YORK 鈥� The Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University and the 红杏视频 yesterday sent a letter to six senators asking them to intervene in a stalled Department of Defense review that is blocking publication of a former military criminal investigator鈥檚 book on government torture. Mark Fallon, a 27-year veteran of the Naval Criminal Investigative Service (NCIS), submitted his manuscript, 鈥淯njustifiable Means,鈥� to the Defense Department for review seven months ago, but has been refused basic information about its status. 鈥淭he government鈥檚 process for reviewing manuscripts by former employees must not become a proxy for the suppression of dissent,鈥� said Alex Abdo, a senior staff attorney at the Knight Institute. 鈥淢ark鈥檚 insider perspective of the torture of prisoners is a unique one that the American public has a right to hear at a critical moment in the debate over government torture.鈥� Fallon served in the NCIS when torture was authorized by government officials at the highest levels, and his manuscript details the costs of these policies to American interests and values. The First Amendment requires that any review of manuscripts by former government employees be prompt. Yet Fallon has not been informed why his manuscript 鈥� which relies heavily on information that鈥檚 not only unclassified but already public 鈥� is stuck in limbo or when the Defense Department will complete its overdue review. In the letter, the Knight Institute and the 红杏视频 note that books defending American torture policies do not appear to have faced similar delays: 鈥淚t is hard to escape the inference that the extended delay in reviewing Mr. Fallon鈥檚 book is related to his criticisms of the torture policies. We note that the Defense Department and CIA have authorized (or not stood in the way of) the publication of many books defending those policies.鈥� At present, other government officials are currently engaged in suppressing the full version of the Senate鈥檚 Torture Report. The letter asks six senators who have been outspoken critics of harsh interrogation, to intervene to ensure that the pre-publication review process for books by former staff are not misused to suppress dissent on torture. 鈥淭he torture architects and advocates have controlled the public narrative with the myth that the unlawful prisoner torture program was safe, necessary, and effective 鈥� even while official investigations repeatedly prove that is false,鈥� said Fallon. 鈥淚t's time to hear from, and about the government officials that opposed those inhuman practices and acted with the courage of their convictions and tried to prevent the adoption of torture as a national policy. 鈥楿njustifiable Means鈥� needs to be added to the public debate on this issue, before it's too late.鈥� The letter is available here: /letter/letter-seeking-expedited-review-mark-fallons-unjustifiable-means