ICE and Border Patrol Abuses
Morales v. Chadbourne
Ada Morales is a naturalized U.S. citizen who has been erroneously detained by Rhode Island law enforcement officials on immigration detainers not once, but twice—first in July 2004, and again in May 2009. Her lawsuit arises out of her 2009 imprisonment.
View Case
Learn ºìÐÓÊÓÆµ ICE and Border Patrol Abuses
All Cases
32 ICE and Border Patrol Abuses Cases

Court Case
Sep 2016
ICE and Border Patrol Abuses
J.E.F.M. v. Lynch
The ºìÐÓÊÓÆµ, American Immigration Council, Northwest Immigrant Rights Project, Public Counsel, and K&L Gates LLP filed a nationwide class-action lawsuit on behalf of thousands of children who are challenging the federal government's failure to provide them with legal representation in deportation hearings.
Explore case
Court Case
Sep 2016

ICE and Border Patrol Abuses
J.E.F.M. v. Lynch
The ºìÐÓÊÓÆµ, American Immigration Council, Northwest Immigrant Rights Project, Public Counsel, and K&L Gates LLP filed a nationwide class-action lawsuit on behalf of thousands of children who are challenging the federal government's failure to provide them with legal representation in deportation hearings.

Arizona
Jun 2015
ICE and Border Patrol Abuses
Lopez-Valenzuela, et al. v. Maricopa County, et al.
After a long legal battle the ºìÐÓÊÓÆµ, on behalf of plaintiffs in Lopez Valenzuela v. Maricopa County prevailed by blocking further implementation of a law that for years did not allow judges to even consider bail for criminal defendants who were suspected of having "entered or remained in the United States illegally," and which applied to most state felony charges in Arizona, including relatively minor crimes such as shoplifting and possessing a phony ID. As a result of Proposition 100, which amended the state constitution, state courts were required to jail countless individuals who posed no risk of flight or danger to others.
Explore case
Arizona
Jun 2015

ICE and Border Patrol Abuses
Lopez-Valenzuela, et al. v. Maricopa County, et al.
After a long legal battle the ºìÐÓÊÓÆµ, on behalf of plaintiffs in Lopez Valenzuela v. Maricopa County prevailed by blocking further implementation of a law that for years did not allow judges to even consider bail for criminal defendants who were suspected of having "entered or remained in the United States illegally," and which applied to most state felony charges in Arizona, including relatively minor crimes such as shoplifting and possessing a phony ID. As a result of Proposition 100, which amended the state constitution, state courts were required to jail countless individuals who posed no risk of flight or danger to others.

Georgia
Mar 2015
ICE and Border Patrol Abuses
Georgia Latino Alliance for Human Rights, et al. v. Deal
On June 2, 2011, the ºìÐÓÊÓÆµ Immigrants’ Rights Project joined with the ºìÐÓÊÓÆµ Racial Justice Project, the ºìÐÓÊÓÆµ of Georgia, the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC), Asian Law Caucus, the National Immigration Law Center (NILC), and private co-counsel to file a lawsuit challenging Georgia's anti-immigrant law, HB 87, which was inspired by Arizona's notorious SB 1070. The Georgia law authorized police to demand "papers" demonstrating citizenship or immigration status during traffic stops, criminalized Georgians in their daily interaction with immigrants, and made it nearly impossible for individuals without specific identification documents to access state facilities and services.
Explore case
Georgia
Mar 2015

ICE and Border Patrol Abuses
Georgia Latino Alliance for Human Rights, et al. v. Deal
On June 2, 2011, the ºìÐÓÊÓÆµ Immigrants’ Rights Project joined with the ºìÐÓÊÓÆµ Racial Justice Project, the ºìÐÓÊÓÆµ of Georgia, the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC), Asian Law Caucus, the National Immigration Law Center (NILC), and private co-counsel to file a lawsuit challenging Georgia's anti-immigrant law, HB 87, which was inspired by Arizona's notorious SB 1070. The Georgia law authorized police to demand "papers" demonstrating citizenship or immigration status during traffic stops, criminalized Georgians in their daily interaction with immigrants, and made it nearly impossible for individuals without specific identification documents to access state facilities and services.

Indiana
Feb 2015
ICE and Border Patrol Abuses
Buquer, et al. v. City of Indianapolis
On May 25, 2011 the ºìÐÓÊÓÆµ of Indiana, the ºìÐÓÊÓÆµâ€™s Immigrants’ Rights Project, and the National Immigration Law Center (NILC). filed a class action lawsuit challenging a discriminatory Indiana law inspired by Arizona’s notorious SB 1070. According to the lawsuit, the law unlawfully authorizes police to make warrantless arrests of individuals based on assumed immigration status and criminalizes the mere use or acceptance of the commonly used consular ID card. The groups charged that the law would lead to racial profiling and trample upon the rights of all Indiana residents in violation of the U.S. Constitution.
Explore case
Indiana
Feb 2015

ICE and Border Patrol Abuses
Buquer, et al. v. City of Indianapolis
On May 25, 2011 the ºìÐÓÊÓÆµ of Indiana, the ºìÐÓÊÓÆµâ€™s Immigrants’ Rights Project, and the National Immigration Law Center (NILC). filed a class action lawsuit challenging a discriminatory Indiana law inspired by Arizona’s notorious SB 1070. According to the lawsuit, the law unlawfully authorizes police to make warrantless arrests of individuals based on assumed immigration status and criminalizes the mere use or acceptance of the commonly used consular ID card. The groups charged that the law would lead to racial profiling and trample upon the rights of all Indiana residents in violation of the U.S. Constitution.