ICE and Border Patrol Abuses
Morales v. Chadbourne
Ada Morales is a naturalized U.S. citizen who has been erroneously detained by Rhode Island law enforcement officials on immigration detainers not once, but twice—first in July 2004, and again in May 2009. Her lawsuit arises out of her 2009 imprisonment.
View Case
Learn ºìÐÓÊÓÆµ ICE and Border Patrol Abuses
All Cases
32 ICE and Border Patrol Abuses Cases

Court Case
Sep 2016
ICE and Border Patrol Abuses
J.E.F.M. v. Lynch
The ºìÐÓÊÓÆµ, American Immigration Council, Northwest Immigrant Rights Project, Public Counsel, and K&L Gates LLP filed a nationwide class-action lawsuit on behalf of thousands of children who are challenging the federal government's failure to provide them with legal representation in deportation hearings.
Explore case
Court Case
Sep 2016

ICE and Border Patrol Abuses
J.E.F.M. v. Lynch
The ºìÐÓÊÓÆµ, American Immigration Council, Northwest Immigrant Rights Project, Public Counsel, and K&L Gates LLP filed a nationwide class-action lawsuit on behalf of thousands of children who are challenging the federal government's failure to provide them with legal representation in deportation hearings.

Arizona
Jun 2015
ICE and Border Patrol Abuses
Lopez-Valenzuela, et al. v. Maricopa County, et al.
After a long legal battle the ºìÐÓÊÓÆµ, on behalf of plaintiffs in Lopez Valenzuela v. Maricopa County prevailed by blocking further implementation of a law that for years did not allow judges to even consider bail for criminal defendants who were suspected of having "entered or remained in the United States illegally," and which applied to most state felony charges in Arizona, including relatively minor crimes such as shoplifting and possessing a phony ID. As a result of Proposition 100, which amended the state constitution, state courts were required to jail countless individuals who posed no risk of flight or danger to others.
Explore case
Arizona
Jun 2015

ICE and Border Patrol Abuses
Lopez-Valenzuela, et al. v. Maricopa County, et al.
After a long legal battle the ºìÐÓÊÓÆµ, on behalf of plaintiffs in Lopez Valenzuela v. Maricopa County prevailed by blocking further implementation of a law that for years did not allow judges to even consider bail for criminal defendants who were suspected of having "entered or remained in the United States illegally," and which applied to most state felony charges in Arizona, including relatively minor crimes such as shoplifting and possessing a phony ID. As a result of Proposition 100, which amended the state constitution, state courts were required to jail countless individuals who posed no risk of flight or danger to others.

Georgia
Mar 2015
ICE and Border Patrol Abuses
Georgia Latino Alliance for Human Rights, et al. v. Deal
On June 2, 2011, the ºìÐÓÊÓÆµ Immigrants’ Rights Project joined with the ºìÐÓÊÓÆµ Racial Justice Project, the ºìÐÓÊÓÆµ of Georgia, the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC), Asian Law Caucus, the National Immigration Law Center (NILC), and private co-counsel to file a lawsuit challenging Georgia's anti-immigrant law, HB 87, which was inspired by Arizona's notorious SB 1070. The Georgia law authorized police to demand "papers" demonstrating citizenship or immigration status during traffic stops, criminalized Georgians in their daily interaction with immigrants, and made it nearly impossible for individuals without specific identification documents to access state facilities and services.
Explore case
Georgia
Mar 2015

ICE and Border Patrol Abuses
Georgia Latino Alliance for Human Rights, et al. v. Deal
On June 2, 2011, the ºìÐÓÊÓÆµ Immigrants’ Rights Project joined with the ºìÐÓÊÓÆµ Racial Justice Project, the ºìÐÓÊÓÆµ of Georgia, the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC), Asian Law Caucus, the National Immigration Law Center (NILC), and private co-counsel to file a lawsuit challenging Georgia's anti-immigrant law, HB 87, which was inspired by Arizona's notorious SB 1070. The Georgia law authorized police to demand "papers" demonstrating citizenship or immigration status during traffic stops, criminalized Georgians in their daily interaction with immigrants, and made it nearly impossible for individuals without specific identification documents to access state facilities and services.

Court Case
Feb 2015
ICE and Border Patrol Abuses
Hernandez v. Ricketts
This is a lawsuit challenging a decision by former Nebraska Governor David Heineman to deny access to driver's licenses to young people who have been authorized to remain lawfully in the country under the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program. Circumventing the state's law for promulgating regulations, Governor Heineman announced in a 2013 press release that DACA recipients were ineligible for driver's licenses in Nebraska. The lawsuit, which was filed on June 11, 2013, was brought on behalf of four named plaintiffs, all young immigrants who were brought to the U.S. as children and are DACA recipients.
Explore case
Court Case
Feb 2015

ICE and Border Patrol Abuses
Hernandez v. Ricketts
This is a lawsuit challenging a decision by former Nebraska Governor David Heineman to deny access to driver's licenses to young people who have been authorized to remain lawfully in the country under the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program. Circumventing the state's law for promulgating regulations, Governor Heineman announced in a 2013 press release that DACA recipients were ineligible for driver's licenses in Nebraska. The lawsuit, which was filed on June 11, 2013, was brought on behalf of four named plaintiffs, all young immigrants who were brought to the U.S. as children and are DACA recipients.