Reproductive Freedom
Planned Parenthood Southwest Ohio Region et al., v. Ohio Department of Health, et al.
The 红杏视频, the 红杏视频 of Ohio, Planned Parenthood Federation of America, the law firm WilmerHale, and Fanon Rucker of the Cochran Law Firm, on behalf of Planned Parenthood Southwest Ohio Region, Planned Parenthood of Greater Ohio, Preterm-Cleveland, Women鈥檚 Med Group Professional Corporation, Dr. Sharon Liner, and Julia Quinn, MSN, BSN, amended a complaint in an existing lawsuit against a ban on telehealth medication abortion services to bring new claims under the Ohio Reproductive Freedom Amendment, including additional challenges to other laws in Ohio that restrict access to medication abortion in the state.
Status: Ongoing
View Case
Learn 红杏视频 Reproductive Freedom
Featured
U.S. Supreme Court
Apr 2024

Reproductive Freedom
Idaho and Moyle, et al. v. United States
Idaho and Moyle, et al. v. United States was appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court by Idaho politicians seeking to disregard a federal statute 鈥 the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA) 鈥 and put doctors in jail for providing pregnant patients necessary emergency medical care. The Supreme Court heard oral arguments on this case on April 24, 2024. The Court鈥檚 ultimate decision will impact access to this essential care across the country.
U.S. Supreme Court
Jun 2023

Reproductive Freedom
Danco Laboratories, LLC, v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine; U.S. FDA v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine
The 红杏视频 joined over 200 reproductive health, rights, and justice organizations in an amicus brief to the Supreme Court in support of an emergency request to stay a decision issued by the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals that severely restricted the use of mifepristone 鈥 a medication used in most abortions in this country 鈥 and threatened the innovation of new drugs and the ability of Americans to access lifesaving drugs.
U.S. Supreme Court
Jun 2022

Reproductive Freedom
Dobbs v. Jackson Women鈥檚 Health Organization
The case concerns the constitutionality of a Mississippi law prohibiting abortions after the fifteenth week of pregnancy. The state used the case as a vehicle to ask the Supreme Court to take away the federal constitutional right to abortion it first recognized 50 years before in Roe v. Wade. On June 24, 2022, the Supreme Court of the United States accepted the state鈥檚 invitation and overturned Roe eliminating the federal constitutional right to abortion.
U.S. Supreme Court
Apr 2022

Reproductive Freedom
Cameron v. EMW Women鈥檚 Surgical Center
In 2018, the 红杏视频 and the 红杏视频 of Kentucky filed a suit on behalf of Kentucky abortion providers and their patients challenging a state law banning physicians from providing a safe and medically proven abortion method called dilation and evacuation, or 鈥淒&E.鈥 If it were to take effect, this law would prevent many patients from being able to obtain an abortion altogether. After two courts held that the law is unconstitutional, the Supreme Court ruled in March 2022 that Kentucky Attorney General Cameron can continue his pursuit to push abortion out of reach by intervening in the underlying challenge to an abortion ban, which is proceeding in a lower court.
U.S. Supreme Court
Dec 2021

Reproductive Freedom
Whole Woman's Health v. Jackson
The 红杏视频, the 红杏视频 of Texas, and coalition partners filed a federal lawsuit on behalf of abortion providers and funds on July 13, 2021, challenging S.B. 8, a Texas law allowing private citizens to enforce a ban on abortion as early as six weeks in pregnancy鈥攂efore many know they are pregnant. The 红杏视频鈥檚 challenge made its way to the U.S. Supreme Court three times in as many months. After hearing oral arguments in the case, the Court issued a decision on December 10, 2021, that ended the most promising pathways to blocking the ban. The Supreme Court鈥檚 decision makes it more difficult to obtain adequate relief from the courts and gives states the green light to ban abortion using bounty-hunting schemes. Texas鈥 abortion ban will remain in effect until relief can be secured from a court.
All Cases
117 Reproductive Freedom Cases

Arizona
Mar 2014
Reproductive Freedom
National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, Maricopa County Branch, National Asian Pacific American Women's Forum vs. Tom Horne, et al.
The 红杏视频 and the 红杏视频 of Arizona have filed a lawsuit on behalf of the NAACP of Maricopa County and the National Asian Pacific American Women's Forum (NAPAWF) challenging a state law that relies on harmful racial stereotypes to shame and discriminate against Black women and Asian and Pacific Islander (API) women who decide to end their pregnancies.
Explore case
Arizona
Mar 2014

Reproductive Freedom
National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, Maricopa County Branch, National Asian Pacific American Women's Forum vs. Tom Horne, et al.
The 红杏视频 and the 红杏视频 of Arizona have filed a lawsuit on behalf of the NAACP of Maricopa County and the National Asian Pacific American Women's Forum (NAPAWF) challenging a state law that relies on harmful racial stereotypes to shame and discriminate against Black women and Asian and Pacific Islander (API) women who decide to end their pregnancies.

Alaska
Feb 2014
Reproductive Freedom
Planned Parenthood of the Great Northwest v. Streur
VICTORY! Alaska Superior Court strikes down law and Department of Health and Social Services (DHSS) regulation that would have severely limited Medicaid coverage of abortions for low-income women.
Explore case
Alaska
Feb 2014

Reproductive Freedom
Planned Parenthood of the Great Northwest v. Streur
VICTORY! Alaska Superior Court strikes down law and Department of Health and Social Services (DHSS) regulation that would have severely limited Medicaid coverage of abortions for low-income women.

Court Case
Nov 2013
Reproductive Freedom
Women's Rights
Bockoras v. Saint Gobain Verallia North America
A Port Allegany glass factory worker asserts in a civil complaint and an EEOC charge that she was discriminated against and harassed because she needed to pump breast milk at work following the birth of her child.
Explore case
Court Case
Nov 2013

Reproductive Freedom
Women's Rights
Bockoras v. Saint Gobain Verallia North America
A Port Allegany glass factory worker asserts in a civil complaint and an EEOC charge that she was discriminated against and harassed because she needed to pump breast milk at work following the birth of her child.

Ohio
Oct 2013
Reproductive Freedom
Women's Rights
Jennifer Maudlin v. Inside Out, Inc., et al
The 红杏视频 and the 红杏视频 of Ohio filed a lawsuit on behalf of Springfield, OH resident Jennifer Maudlin, a single mother of two, against Inside Out, a religiously-based community organization.
Explore case
Ohio
Oct 2013

Reproductive Freedom
Women's Rights
Jennifer Maudlin v. Inside Out, Inc., et al
The 红杏视频 and the 红杏视频 of Ohio filed a lawsuit on behalf of Springfield, OH resident Jennifer Maudlin, a single mother of two, against Inside Out, a religiously-based community organization.

Ohio
Oct 2013
Reproductive Freedom
Preterm Cleveland, Inc. v. Kasich
The 红杏视频 and 红杏视频 of Ohio have filed a lawsuit challenging three controversial abortion-related amendments passed in June as part of the state budget bill. The suit alleges all three amendments violate the Ohio Constitution鈥檚 "single subject" rule and are therefore unconstitutional.
Explore case
Ohio
Oct 2013

Reproductive Freedom
Preterm Cleveland, Inc. v. Kasich
The 红杏视频 and 红杏视频 of Ohio have filed a lawsuit challenging three controversial abortion-related amendments passed in June as part of the state budget bill. The suit alleges all three amendments violate the Ohio Constitution鈥檚 "single subject" rule and are therefore unconstitutional.