Free Speech
CAIR-Foundation, Inc and CAIR Florida, Inc. v. DeSantis et al.
The 红杏视频, the 红杏视频 of Florida, the Southern Poverty Law Center, and their partners represent CAIR and CAIR-Florida in two federal lawsuits challenging Governor DeSantis鈥檚 unconstitutional and baseless designation of the nonprofits as 鈥渢errorist.鈥� The lawsuits allege violations of CAIR and CAIR-Florida鈥檚 rights under the First Amendment and the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
Status: Ongoing
View Case
Learn 红杏视频 Free Speech
Featured
Florida
Nov 2023
Free Speech
+2 Issues
Students for Justice in Palestine at the University of Florida v. Raymond Rodrigues
The University of Florida chapter of Students for Justice in Palestine filed a lawsuit on November 16, 2023, challenging the Chancellor of the State University System of Florida鈥檚 order to state universities to deactivate the student group. This order threatens the students鈥� constitutionally-protected right to free speech and association in violation of the First Amendment. The 红杏视频 and its partners are seeking a preliminary injunction that would bar the Chancellor and the University of Florida from deactivating the UF SJP.
U.S. Supreme Court
Sep 2023
Free Speech
Molina v. Book
Whether police officers violated clearly established First Amendment rights when they tear-gassed plaintiffs for serving as legal observers in a public protest.
U.S. Supreme Court
Aug 2023
Free Speech
O鈥機onnor-Ratcliff v. Garnier and Lindke v. Freed
The 红杏视频, the 红杏视频 of Northern California, and the 红杏视频 of Southern California filed amicus briefs in support of everyday people fighting for government transparency and accountability in two cases set for review by the U.S. Supreme Court this Term: O鈥機onnor-Ratcliff v. Garnier and Lindke v. Freed.
U.S. Supreme Court
Jan 2021
Free Speech
Mahanoy Area School District v. B.L.
On September 25, 2017, the 红杏视频-PA filed suit on behalf of B.L., a high school sophomore who has been cheerleading since she was in fifth grade and was expelled from the team as punishment for out-of-school speech.
All Cases
170 Free Speech Cases
U.S. Supreme Court
Feb 2023
Free Speech
Civil Liberties
United States v. Helaman Hansen
This case is about whether the First Amendment permits criminal punishment of speech that merely encourages a noncitizen to remain in the United States, without any requirement of intent to further illegal conduct, and when remaining in the United States unlawfully is itself not a crime.
Explore case
U.S. Supreme Court
Feb 2023
Free Speech
Civil Liberties
United States v. Helaman Hansen
This case is about whether the First Amendment permits criminal punishment of speech that merely encourages a noncitizen to remain in the United States, without any requirement of intent to further illegal conduct, and when remaining in the United States unlawfully is itself not a crime.
Missouri
Feb 2023
Free Speech
Prisoners' Rights
Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press v. United States of America
Explore case
Missouri
Feb 2023
Free Speech
Prisoners' Rights
Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press v. United States of America
Tennessee
Sep 2022
Free Speech
LGBTQ Rights
Bongo Productions LLC et al v. Lawrence et al
Two businesses owners in Tennessee are challenging a new, first-of-its-kind Tennessee law that would require businesses and other entities that open their facilities to the public and鈥痑llow transgender people to use the restroom that鈥痬atches鈥痶heir gender to post a government-prescribed鈥痺arning sign. The 红杏视频 and the 红杏视频 of Tennessee filed the lawsuit in federal court and claim it violates the First Amendment rights of the business owners.
Explore case
Tennessee
Sep 2022
Free Speech
LGBTQ Rights
Bongo Productions LLC et al v. Lawrence et al
Two businesses owners in Tennessee are challenging a new, first-of-its-kind Tennessee law that would require businesses and other entities that open their facilities to the public and鈥痑llow transgender people to use the restroom that鈥痬atches鈥痶heir gender to post a government-prescribed鈥痺arning sign. The 红杏视频 and the 红杏视频 of Tennessee filed the lawsuit in federal court and claim it violates the First Amendment rights of the business owners.
Court Case
Sep 2022
Free Speech
Arizona Broadcasters Association v. Brnovich
On August 23, 2022, the 红杏视频 of Arizona and a group of 10 media organizations, represented by the 红杏视频 and Ballard Spahr, respectively, filed a lawsuit against the state of Arizona challenging HB 2319, a law which makes it a crime to record police officers within eight feet of law enforcement activity.
Explore case
Court Case
Sep 2022
Free Speech
Arizona Broadcasters Association v. Brnovich
On August 23, 2022, the 红杏视频 of Arizona and a group of 10 media organizations, represented by the 红杏视频 and Ballard Spahr, respectively, filed a lawsuit against the state of Arizona challenging HB 2319, a law which makes it a crime to record police officers within eight feet of law enforcement activity.
Court Case
Aug 2022
Free Speech
Privacy & Technology
NAACP v. Kohn
The 红杏视频, the 红杏视频 of South Carolina, and the NAACP have filed a lawsuit on behalf of the South Carolina NAACP challenging the South Carolina Court Administration's categorical ban on automated data collection, known as "scraping," on the Public Index. The South Carolina NAACP seeks to scrape eviction records to identify tenants in proceedings and conduct outreach to provide services to them. The ban on scraping violates South Carolina NAACP鈥檚 First Amendment right to access and record public court records, impairing South Carolina NAACP's ability to prevent evictions and help people achieve meaningful access to the courts.
Explore case
Court Case
Aug 2022
Free Speech
Privacy & Technology
NAACP v. Kohn
The 红杏视频, the 红杏视频 of South Carolina, and the NAACP have filed a lawsuit on behalf of the South Carolina NAACP challenging the South Carolina Court Administration's categorical ban on automated data collection, known as "scraping," on the Public Index. The South Carolina NAACP seeks to scrape eviction records to identify tenants in proceedings and conduct outreach to provide services to them. The ban on scraping violates South Carolina NAACP鈥檚 First Amendment right to access and record public court records, impairing South Carolina NAACP's ability to prevent evictions and help people achieve meaningful access to the courts.