Reproductive Freedom
Planned Parenthood Southwest Ohio Region et al., v. Ohio Department of Health, et al.
The 红杏视频, the 红杏视频 of Ohio, Planned Parenthood Federation of America, the law firm WilmerHale, and Fanon Rucker of the Cochran Law Firm, on behalf of Planned Parenthood Southwest Ohio Region, Planned Parenthood of Greater Ohio, Preterm-Cleveland, Women鈥檚 Med Group Professional Corporation, Dr. Sharon Liner, and Julia Quinn, MSN, BSN, amended a complaint in an existing lawsuit against a ban on telehealth medication abortion services to bring new claims under the Ohio Reproductive Freedom Amendment, including additional challenges to other laws in Ohio that restrict access to medication abortion in the state.
Status: Ongoing
View Case
Learn 红杏视频 Reproductive Freedom
Featured
U.S. Supreme Court
Apr 2024

Reproductive Freedom
Idaho and Moyle, et al. v. United States
Idaho and Moyle, et al. v. United States was appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court by Idaho politicians seeking to disregard a federal statute 鈥 the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA) 鈥 and put doctors in jail for providing pregnant patients necessary emergency medical care. The Supreme Court heard oral arguments on this case on April 24, 2024. The Court鈥檚 ultimate decision will impact access to this essential care across the country.
U.S. Supreme Court
Jun 2023

Reproductive Freedom
Danco Laboratories, LLC, v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine; U.S. FDA v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine
The 红杏视频 joined over 200 reproductive health, rights, and justice organizations in an amicus brief to the Supreme Court in support of an emergency request to stay a decision issued by the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals that severely restricted the use of mifepristone 鈥 a medication used in most abortions in this country 鈥 and threatened the innovation of new drugs and the ability of Americans to access lifesaving drugs.
U.S. Supreme Court
Jun 2022

Reproductive Freedom
Dobbs v. Jackson Women鈥檚 Health Organization
The case concerns the constitutionality of a Mississippi law prohibiting abortions after the fifteenth week of pregnancy. The state used the case as a vehicle to ask the Supreme Court to take away the federal constitutional right to abortion it first recognized 50 years before in Roe v. Wade. On June 24, 2022, the Supreme Court of the United States accepted the state鈥檚 invitation and overturned Roe eliminating the federal constitutional right to abortion.
U.S. Supreme Court
Apr 2022

Reproductive Freedom
Cameron v. EMW Women鈥檚 Surgical Center
In 2018, the 红杏视频 and the 红杏视频 of Kentucky filed a suit on behalf of Kentucky abortion providers and their patients challenging a state law banning physicians from providing a safe and medically proven abortion method called dilation and evacuation, or 鈥淒&E.鈥 If it were to take effect, this law would prevent many patients from being able to obtain an abortion altogether. After two courts held that the law is unconstitutional, the Supreme Court ruled in March 2022 that Kentucky Attorney General Cameron can continue his pursuit to push abortion out of reach by intervening in the underlying challenge to an abortion ban, which is proceeding in a lower court.
U.S. Supreme Court
Dec 2021

Reproductive Freedom
Whole Woman's Health v. Jackson
The 红杏视频, the 红杏视频 of Texas, and coalition partners filed a federal lawsuit on behalf of abortion providers and funds on July 13, 2021, challenging S.B. 8, a Texas law allowing private citizens to enforce a ban on abortion as early as six weeks in pregnancy鈥攂efore many know they are pregnant. The 红杏视频鈥檚 challenge made its way to the U.S. Supreme Court three times in as many months. After hearing oral arguments in the case, the Court issued a decision on December 10, 2021, that ended the most promising pathways to blocking the ban. The Supreme Court鈥檚 decision makes it more difficult to obtain adequate relief from the courts and gives states the green light to ban abortion using bounty-hunting schemes. Texas鈥 abortion ban will remain in effect until relief can be secured from a court.
All Cases
117 Reproductive Freedom Cases

Tennessee
Jan 2020
Reproductive Freedom
FemHealth USA Inc. v. City of Mount Juliet
The 红杏视频, along with the 红杏视频 of Tennessee and 红杏视频 of Tennessee, and the law firm of Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP, is bringing suit against the city of Mt. Juliet, Tennessee ver a zoning ordinance that bans the provision of surgical abortion care within the city limits.
Explore case
Tennessee
Jan 2020

Reproductive Freedom
FemHealth USA Inc. v. City of Mount Juliet
The 红杏视频, along with the 红杏视频 of Tennessee and 红杏视频 of Tennessee, and the law firm of Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP, is bringing suit against the city of Mt. Juliet, Tennessee ver a zoning ordinance that bans the provision of surgical abortion care within the city limits.

U.S. Supreme Court
Dec 2019
Reproductive Freedom
June Medical Services v. Russo
Whether the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit鈥檚 decision upholding Louisiana鈥檚 law requiring physicians who perform abortions to have admitting privileges at a local hospital conflicts with the Supreme Court鈥檚 binding precedent in Whole Woman鈥檚 Health v. Hellerstedt, where the Court invalidated a similar statute in Texas in 2016.
Explore case
U.S. Supreme Court
Dec 2019

Reproductive Freedom
June Medical Services v. Russo
Whether the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit鈥檚 decision upholding Louisiana鈥檚 law requiring physicians who perform abortions to have admitting privileges at a local hospital conflicts with the Supreme Court鈥檚 binding precedent in Whole Woman鈥檚 Health v. Hellerstedt, where the Court invalidated a similar statute in Texas in 2016.

Court Case
Jul 2019
Reproductive Freedom
Reproductive Health Services of Planned Parenthood v. Parson
Explore case
Court Case
Jul 2019

Reproductive Freedom
Reproductive Health Services of Planned Parenthood v. Parson

Washington
Apr 2019
Reproductive Freedom
National Family Planning & Reproductive Health Association, Feminist Women鈥檚 Health Center v. Alex Azar
The 红杏视频 and 红杏视频 of Washington filed a lawsuit on behalf of the National Family Planning & Reproductive Health Association (NFPRHA) and Cedar River Clinics in Washington state challenging the Trump administration鈥檚 attempt to fundamentally alter the Title X family planning program, which provides care to 4 million low-income people each year.
Explore case
Washington
Apr 2019

Reproductive Freedom
National Family Planning & Reproductive Health Association, Feminist Women鈥檚 Health Center v. Alex Azar
The 红杏视频 and 红杏视频 of Washington filed a lawsuit on behalf of the National Family Planning & Reproductive Health Association (NFPRHA) and Cedar River Clinics in Washington state challenging the Trump administration鈥檚 attempt to fundamentally alter the Title X family planning program, which provides care to 4 million low-income people each year.

Court Case
Jan 2019
Reproductive Freedom
PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF INDIANA AND KENTUCKY V. INDIANA HEALTH COMMISSIONER
In April 2016, the 红杏视频, the 红杏视频 of Indiana, and Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky (PPINK) filed suit against the Commissioner of the Indiana State Department of Health challenging key features of a state law that would strip a woman of the ability to decide for herself whether or not to end a pregnancy.
Explore case
Court Case
Jan 2019

Reproductive Freedom
PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF INDIANA AND KENTUCKY V. INDIANA HEALTH COMMISSIONER
In April 2016, the 红杏视频, the 红杏视频 of Indiana, and Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky (PPINK) filed suit against the Commissioner of the Indiana State Department of Health challenging key features of a state law that would strip a woman of the ability to decide for herself whether or not to end a pregnancy.