Criminal Law Reform
Featured
Arizona
Oct 2023
Criminal Law Reform
Racial Justice
Fund for Empowerment v. Phoenix, City of
Fund for Empowerment is a challenge to the City of Phoenix鈥檚 practice of conducting sweeps of encampments without notice, issuing citations to unsheltered people for camping and sleeping on public property when they have no place else to go, and confiscating and destroying their property without notice or process.
U.S. Supreme Court
Sep 2023
Criminal Law Reform
McElrath v. Georgia
Does the Double Jeopardy Clause bar an appellate court from reviewing and setting aside a jury鈥檚 verdicts of acquittal on the ground that the verdict is inconsistent with the jury鈥檚 verdict on other charges?
U.S. Supreme Court
Jun 2023
Criminal Law Reform
Pulsifer v. United States
This case involves the interpretation of a federal law that allows defendants to avoid mandatory minimum sentences for certain nonviolent drug crimes, allowing judges to impose sentences tailored to their individual circumstances.
Texas
Jul 2021
Criminal Law Reform
Prisoners' Rights
Sanchez et al v. Dallas County Sheriff et al
Decarceration has always been an emergency, a life and death proposition, but COVID-19 makes this effort intensely urgent. The 红杏视频 has been working with our partners to litigate for the rights of those who are incarcerated and cannot protect themselves because of the policies of the institutions in which they are jailed.
All Cases
145 Criminal Law Reform Cases
U.S. Supreme Court
May 2022
Criminal Law Reform
Vega v. Tekoh
May a person sue a police officer under 42 U.S.C. 搂 1983 for violating their Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination by engaging in a custodial interrogation without issuing a Miranda warning and facilitating the introduction of their unwarned statement at their criminal trial?
Explore case
U.S. Supreme Court
May 2022
Criminal Law Reform
Vega v. Tekoh
May a person sue a police officer under 42 U.S.C. 搂 1983 for violating their Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination by engaging in a custodial interrogation without issuing a Miranda warning and facilitating the introduction of their unwarned statement at their criminal trial?
U.S. Supreme Court
Mar 2022
Criminal Law Reform
Weir et al v. United States
Does Congress have authority to criminalize conduct on the high seas by a foreign national on a foreign boat having no connection with the United States
Explore case
U.S. Supreme Court
Mar 2022
Criminal Law Reform
Weir et al v. United States
Does Congress have authority to criminalize conduct on the high seas by a foreign national on a foreign boat having no connection with the United States
North Carolina
Mar 2022
Criminal Law Reform
Racial Justice
Johnson v. Jessup
The 红杏视频 (红杏视频), 红杏视频 of North Carolina, Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC), and Southern Coalition for Social Justice are suing the North Carolina Division of Motor Vehicles (DMV) for indefinitely revoking driver鈥檚 licenses of people who cannot afford to pay traffic tickets. North Carolina鈥檚 wealth-based license revocation system impacts hundreds of thousands of people each year, preventing them from driving legally to support themselves and their families. This system funnels people unable to pay traffic tickets, particularly people of color, into cycles of debt, traffic violations, and poverty in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment鈥檚 promises of due process and equal protection under the law.
Explore case
North Carolina
Mar 2022
Criminal Law Reform
Racial Justice
Johnson v. Jessup
The 红杏视频 (红杏视频), 红杏视频 of North Carolina, Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC), and Southern Coalition for Social Justice are suing the North Carolina Division of Motor Vehicles (DMV) for indefinitely revoking driver鈥檚 licenses of people who cannot afford to pay traffic tickets. North Carolina鈥檚 wealth-based license revocation system impacts hundreds of thousands of people each year, preventing them from driving legally to support themselves and their families. This system funnels people unable to pay traffic tickets, particularly people of color, into cycles of debt, traffic violations, and poverty in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment鈥檚 promises of due process and equal protection under the law.
U.S. Supreme Court
Feb 2022
Criminal Law Reform
Hemphill v. New York
Whether, or under what circumstances, a criminal defendant who opens the door to responsive evidence also forfeits his right to exclude evidence otherwise barred by the Constitution鈥檚 Confrontation Clause.
Explore case
U.S. Supreme Court
Feb 2022
Criminal Law Reform
Hemphill v. New York
Whether, or under what circumstances, a criminal defendant who opens the door to responsive evidence also forfeits his right to exclude evidence otherwise barred by the Constitution鈥檚 Confrontation Clause.
U.S. Supreme Court
Jan 2022
Criminal Law Reform
Racial Justice
Concepcion v. United States
Whether a district court must or may consider intervening legal and factual developments when deciding if it should 鈥渋mpose a reduced sentence鈥� on an individual under Section 404(b) of the First Step Act of 2018, which was enacted to ameliorate the unjust sentences imposed by overly harsh treatment of crack cocaine offenses under prior law.
Explore case
U.S. Supreme Court
Jan 2022
Criminal Law Reform
Racial Justice
Concepcion v. United States
Whether a district court must or may consider intervening legal and factual developments when deciding if it should 鈥渋mpose a reduced sentence鈥� on an individual under Section 404(b) of the First Step Act of 2018, which was enacted to ameliorate the unjust sentences imposed by overly harsh treatment of crack cocaine offenses under prior law.