红杏视频

UPDATE: On June 17th, the U.S. District Court of Massachusetts ordered that the State Department must allow people with a gender identity different from their sex assigned at birth to self-select the sex designation on their passport while the 红杏视频鈥檚 Orr v. Trump case proceeds so long as they do not have an existing passport with the sex designation they want on it that does not expire for more than a year from when they apply. Learn more about how and when to apply here.

On January 20, 2025, Trump signed an executive order attempting to mandate discrimination against transgender people across the federal government and government programs. This included a directive to the Departments of State and Homeland Security 鈥渢o require that government-issued identification documents, including passports, visas, and Global Entry cards鈥� reflect their sex 鈥渁t conception.鈥� Under the ensuing Passport Policy, within 24 hours the State Department began holding some passports and other documents (such as birth certificates and court orders) submitted by transgender, intersex, and nonbinary people who had applied to update the sex designation on their U.S. passports and returning others with their applications rejected and their newly-issued passport marked with their sex assigned at birth.

The 红杏视频, 红杏视频 of Massachusetts, and law firm Covington & Burling LLP filed a federal lawsuit on behalf of seven people who have not been able to obtain passports that match who they are because of the State Department鈥檚 new Passport Policy or are likely to be impacted by the new policy upon their next renewal.

The lawsuit argues the policy is arbitrary and capricious, violates the right to travel and right to privacy under the Due Process Clause of the U.S. Constitution, violates the Equal Protection Clause of the U.S. Constitution, and compels speech from transgender, nonbinary, and intersex passport holders in violation of their First Amendment rights.

鈥淚 thought that 18 years after transitioning, I would be able to live my life in safety and ease,鈥� said Reid Solomon-Lane, a transgender man from western Massachusetts and plaintiff in this case. 鈥淣ow, as a married father of three, Trump鈥檚 executive order and the ensuing passport policy have threatened that life of safety and ease. If my passport were to reflect a sex designation that is inconsistent with who I am, I would be forcibly outed every time I used my passport for travel or identification, causing potential harm to my safety and my family鈥檚 safety.鈥�