Killinger v. Jager

Location: Nevada
Status: Ongoing
Last Update: September 23, 2026

What's at Stake

On September 21, 2026, the ºìÐÓÊÓÆµ, ºìÐÓÊÓÆµ of Nevada and the Innocence Project filed an amicus brief in the District of Nevada in support of Jason Killinger, a man wrongfully arrested after police relied on an incorrect result from facial recognition technology.

Summary


In September 2023, Jason Killinger was arrested at Peppermill Casino in Reno when casino security suddenly surrounded him, took him to the casino’s security office and detained him until a Reno police officer arrived. Mr. Killinger was arrested because the casino’s facial recognition security camera system alerted to Mr. Killinger being a possible match for another individual who had been banned from the premises.

When Mr. Killinger produced his valid commercial driver’s license to prove that he was not the individual who had been banned from the casino, the police officer concluded that the facial recognition result must be correct and surmised, without support, that Mr. Killinger’s identification was therefore fraudulent. After transporting Mr. Killinger to jail, a fingerprint search revealed that he was, in fact, who he said he was. A detective investigated and concluded that the casino’s facial recognition technology was wrong.

The brief asks the court to rule that police lacked probable cause to arrest Mr. Killinger based on a facial recognition technology result because facial recognition technology is fundamentally unreliable. The brief also asks the court to rule that the City of Reno is liable for Mr. Killinger’s wrongful arrest. The risk that officer’s’ overreliance on facial recognition technology would lead to violations of constitutional rights was so obvious and foreseeable that failing to provide training to Reno Police Department officers amounts to deliberate indifference.

Support our on-going litigation and work in the courts

Related Issues